On Friday 29 October 2004 16:27, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 04:17:30PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > p.s. Last I looked, GCC ignored unused inlines; no code
> > generated, no warnings. Did that change?
> >...
>
> It didn't change.
>
> But there are three different poss
On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 04:17:30PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Thursday 28 October 2004 17:28, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > [ this time without the problems due to a digital signature... ]
> >
> > The patch below removes an unused function from drivers/usb/net/usbnet.c
>
> Actually in this case I
On Thursday 28 October 2004 17:28, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> [ this time without the problems due to a digital signature... ]
>
> The patch below removes an unused function from drivers/usb/net/usbnet.c
Actually in this case I'd rather leave the function there;
the documentation on this chip is hard t
