On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 01:20:15AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 07:33:52PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Greg, if this doesn't apply to your 2.4.x tree, could you please send me
> > an updated tarball of your tree?
>
> Applied, minus the BUG_ON() part.
Thanks.
> Do you still w
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 07:23:35PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Ben, it looks like your patch broke something for USB keyboards, any
> > idea?
>
> Yep, my patch killed hid-input from scanning HID_OUTPUT_REPORT's. Fixed
> with this patch for 2.5.70+bk. I'll send one for 2.4.x in a few minutes.
Ap
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 07:33:52PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> Greg, if this doesn't apply to your 2.4.x tree, could you please send me
> an updated tarball of your tree?
Applied, minus the BUG_ON() part.
Do you still want a tarball/patch of my usb 2.4 tree? This patch
applied just fine with no
Greg, if this doesn't apply to your 2.4.x tree, could you please send me
an updated tarball of your tree?
--- linux/drivers/usb.new/hid-input.c Thu May 22 22:47:00 2003
+++ linux/drivers/usb/hid-input.c Tue Jun 3 20:35:46 2003
@@ -73,8 +73,11 @@
hidinput = list_entry(lh
Ben Collins wrote:
>>Ben, it looks like your patch broke something for USB keyboards, any
>>idea?
>
>
> Yep, my patch killed hid-input from scanning HID_OUTPUT_REPORT's. Fixed
> with this patch for 2.5.70+bk. I'll send one for 2.4.x in a few minutes.
>
>
Yup, with that patch in place my keyboar
> Ben, it looks like your patch broke something for USB keyboards, any
> idea?
Yep, my patch killed hid-input from scanning HID_OUTPUT_REPORT's. Fixed
with this patch for 2.5.70+bk. I'll send one for 2.4.x in a few minutes.
--- linux/drivers/usb/input/hid-input.c 3 Jun 2003 02:53:07 -
I've narrowed this down. I'll have a patch shortly.
--
Debian - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/
---
This SF.net email is sponsored b
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 06:18:13PM -0500, Jordan Breeding wrote:
> Ben Collins wrote:
> >>Hm, I just tested this on a keyboard here, and can duplicate it.
> >>
> >>Ben, it looks like your patch broke something for USB keyboards, any
> >>idea?
> >
> >
> > My patch alone on 2.4.21-rc4-i386 has work
>
> Hm, I just tested this on a keyboard here, and can duplicate it.
>
> Ben, it looks like your patch broke something for USB keyboards, any
> idea?
My patch alone on 2.4.21-rc4-i386 has working LED's. My patch in your
tree that you sent me with 2.4.21-rc6-sparc64 has broken LED's.
Veeery inte
> Hm, I just tested this on a keyboard here, and can duplicate it.
>
> Ben, it looks like your patch broke something for USB keyboards, any
> idea?
No idea. I'm using a USB keyboard in conjunction with the patch. Let me
try a 2.5.70+bk build tonight to make sure there were no bad
interactions bet
> Hm, I just tested this on a keyboard here, and can duplicate it.
>
> Ben, it looks like your patch broke something for USB keyboards, any
> idea?
Damn. Surprised I never noticed this. Confirmed even with my 2.4
patches.
Give me an hour or so and I'll get you a fix.
--
Debian - http://www
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 01:56:19PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 09:27:05AM -0700, Jordan Breeding wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have an issue with the two current USB updates --
> > they stop my keyboard LEDs from working properly. I
> > run a box with only a USB keyboard and m
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 09:27:05AM -0700, Jordan Breeding wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an issue with the two current USB updates --
> they stop my keyboard LEDs from working properly. I
> run a box with only a USB keyboard and mouse attached.
> With 2.5.70-mm1 everything works fine, then with
>
Hello,
I have an issue with the two current USB updates --
they stop my keyboard LEDs from working properly. I
run a box with only a USB keyboard and mouse attached.
With 2.5.70-mm1 everything works fine, then with
2.5.70-mm3 (after then main BK branch had picked up
some USB updates) the LEDs
14 matches
Mail list logo
