On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 09:44:32AM -0800, Joe Burks wrote:
> This is the same patch as before, without the checks for CONFIG_PROC_FS.
>
> Greg, please apply
Applied, thanks.
greg k-h
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: To learn the basics
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:10:51AM -0800, Joe Burks wrote:
> Greg, please apply
>
> Included in this patch:
>
> - (From John Tyner) Move allocation of memory out of send_control_msg. With
> the allocation moved to open, control messages are less expensive since
> they don't allocate and free me
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 09:17:18PM -0800, Joe Burks wrote:
> Looks good to me. Please include it.
>
> I was working on patches to vicam as well, I guess I'm going to have to
> figure out how to get your pre-release and submit a patch against it now
> :) Any easy way to do this without bit keep
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 07:39:19AM -0800, John Tyner wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch fixes some things that have failed to go in as part of other
> patches that have been rejected. Namely, this adds the forgotten up call
> in the read function, removes the usb_put_dev (since there is no
> usb_get_dev), a
Looks good to me. Please include it.
I was working on patches to vicam as well, I guess I'm going to have to
figure out how to get your pre-release and submit a patch against it now
:) Any easy way to do this without bit keeper?
At 04:13 PM 10/31/2002 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 200
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 07:39:19AM -0800, John Tyner wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch fixes some things that have failed to go in as part of other
> patches that have been rejected. Namely, this adds the forgotten up call
> in the read function, removes the usb_put_dev (since there is no
> usb_get_dev), a
Hi,
This patch fixes some things that have failed to go in as part of other
patches that have been rejected. Namely, this adds the forgotten up call
in the read function, removes the usb_put_dev (since there is no
usb_get_dev), and also moves the allocation and freeing of the image and
frame buffer
