On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 03:05:03PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> fix access to urb->status by introduction of an explicit flag
> for finished data transfer.
Applied, thanks.
greg k-h
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new Insta
On Mon, 31 May 2004 15:23:00 +0200
Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Now that you're fixing this -- Is an unsigned char variable considered
> > enough? I've heard about atomicity concerns on ARM, and also there might
> > be problems with unflushed caches - mb()s may be needed ...
>
> I
Am Montag, 31. Mai 2004 15:16 schrieb Vojtech Pavlik:
> On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 03:05:03PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > fix access to urb->status by introduction of an explicit flag
> > for finished data transfer.
> >
> > Regards
> > Oliver
> >
> > Signed-off-by: O
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 03:05:03PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> fix access to urb->status by introduction of an explicit flag
> for finished data transfer.
>
> Regards
> Oliver
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Now that you're fixing this -- Is an
