[linux-usb-devel] Re: Dane-Elec PhotoMate Combo

2001-04-30 Thread Andries . Brouwer
>>> This config option is considered so immature that it's not ready for >>> kernel config, even as an EXPERIMENTAL. Use it at your own risk. >> Of course. But the choice is simple. Without it, one has a non-functional >> device. With it, one has a device that works beautifully. > I would serio

[linux-usb-devel] Re: Dane-Elec PhotoMate Combo

2001-04-29 Thread Matthew Dharm
I would seriously argue with the "works beautifully" part of that. The DPCM code relies on the SDDR09 code, which is horrendously buggy. It's also being actively worked on. I can crash it at will with relatively simple operations. Matt On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 02:21:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTEC

[linux-usb-devel] Re: Dane-Elec PhotoMate Combo

2001-04-29 Thread Andries . Brouwer
From: Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > (ii) this card needs usb/storage/dpcm.c which is compiled when > CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DPCM is set, but this variable is missing > from usb/Config.in. Add it. This config option is considered so immature that it's not ready for the k

[linux-usb-devel] Re: Dane-Elec PhotoMate Combo

2001-04-28 Thread Matthew Dharm
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 05:02:21PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I just got a Dane-Elec PhotoMate Combo SmartMedia/CompactFlash reader > manufactured by SCM Microsystems. It is a USB device with ID 04e6:0005. > > The http://www.qbik.ch/usb/devices/ list of supported devices > calls this thing