Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: More about reset/config change [was: some analysis of a hang]

2003-08-14 Thread Oliver Neukum
> > > What about drivers that are loaded by hand, well after the initial device > > > setup has finished? Would they get a say in choosing a configuration? > > > > Certainly they should. In the same way their probe() gets called. > > It's another way to (implicitly) request a config change. >

[linux-usb-devel] Re: More about reset/config change [was: some analysis of a hang]

2003-08-14 Thread Alan Stern
I think at this point we're pretty much in agreement. On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, David Brownell wrote: > Yes, choosing between those assumptions/approaches implies design choices > beyond "usb_set_configuration() needs a task context" and "kernel code > other than khubd should be able to choose configu

[linux-usb-devel] Re: More about reset/config change [was: some analysis of a hang]

2003-08-14 Thread David Brownell
Good morning, I just noticed that my previous usb_set_configuration() experiment http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=105484578921888&w=2 was the simplified version, without a driver configure() callback. Posted back in June! No wonder I don't remember it :-) (Quite aside fro