On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 03:26:44PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> > I went ahead and created a patch to change all the places where devio.c
> > uses an interface index. Now it always uses just the interface number.
> > Does this look all right to you? I don't have a convenient way to test
> > it.
>
On Thursday 13 May 2004 19:57, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 01:29:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 May 2004, Duncan Sands wrote:
> > > > I went ahead and created a patch to change all the places where
> > > > devio.c uses an interface index. Now it always uses just the
> >
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 01:29:43PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 13 May 2004, Duncan Sands wrote:
>
> > > I went ahead and created a patch to change all the places where devio.c
> > > uses an interface index. Now it always uses just the interface number.
> > > Does this look all right to you
On Thu, 13 May 2004, Duncan Sands wrote:
> > I went ahead and created a patch to change all the places where devio.c
> > uses an interface index. Now it always uses just the interface number.
> > Does this look all right to you? I don't have a convenient way to test
> > it.
>
> Hi Alan, thanks
> I went ahead and created a patch to change all the places where devio.c
> uses an interface index. Now it always uses just the interface number.
> Does this look all right to you? I don't have a convenient way to test
> it.
Hi Alan, thanks for doing this. It looks and works OK. I added some
