On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 01:52:00 -0700, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your patch mixes a few things in that you probably don't need to show
> how libusual works which bloat the patch. The unusual_devs.h rework
> comes to mind.
> - This only covers the "which module to load" question. Once
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:09:05 -0700, Phil Dibowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A quick look over the patch shows that there are now two kinds of
> unusual_dev entries: unusual_dev() and unusual_dev_fl(), where the
> latter is for entries that don't need to specify SC or PR (i.e., just
> had US_SC_
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:56:27 -0400 (EDT), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Can your scheme accomodate these "subdriver" modules?
Yes. We'd have to add a few types, like USB_US_TYPE_USBAT or something.
> Will the hotplug system work wi
