On Sunday 07 May 2006 4:56 pm, Chris Rankin wrote:
> As it turns out, cdc_ether.ko without rndis_host.ko works too. Well I never.
>
> How much redundancy *is* there with all these different USB network adapters?
More than would be nice. In your case, that ADSL modem implements
both (a) vendor-ne
--- David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to the descriptors you posted, regular cdc_ether should work
> with this device. Maybe even rndis_host. If that doesn't work, please
> post the "lsusb -v" output for the device, as well as CONFIG_USB_DEBUG
> diagnostics for any failures y
--- David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to the descriptors you posted, regular cdc_ether should work
> with this device. Maybe even rndis_host. If that doesn't work, please
> post the "lsusb -v" output for the device, as well as CONFIG_USB_DEBUG
> diagnostics for any failures y
On Saturday 06 May 2006 6:21 pm, Chris Rankin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The BT Voyager 210 USB ADSL modem is a small Linux box that has both a USB
> and an Ethernet port
> internally bound into a bridge device. I can't see why anyone would choose to
> use the USB 1.1
> network port over the Ethernet one
