On Wed, 3 May 2006 10:45:14 -0700, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 12:16:00AM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Should this also go into the -stable queue?
Yes, I think it meets criteria for -stable. It is a bug fix, is not
polluted with unrelated fixes, and is short (49 l
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 12:16:00AM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> In kernel 2.6.16, if a mounted storage device is removed, an oops happens
> because ub supplies an interface device (and kobject) to the block layer,
> but neglects to pin it. And apparently, the block layer expects its users
> to pin
