On Wed, 23 Nov 2005, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:08:08 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > /*
> > * Bulk is easy to shortcut reliably.
> > * XXX Other pipe types need consideration. Currently, we overdo it
> > * and collect garbage for
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:08:08 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /*
>* Bulk is easy to shortcut reliably.
>* XXX Other pipe types need consideration. Currently, we overdo it
>* and collect garbage for them: better more than less.
>*/
>
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 03:44:48PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Someone at linux-usb-devel observed that usbmon should not leak the concept
> of pipe to the user space. This patch makes a compromise between having
> too many words in the line and the pipe. It breaks API, but I doubt anyone
> has an
On Sunday 23 January 2005 5:17 pm, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:34:23 -0800, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ...
> > > and this is what usbmon intercepts.
> > > For one thing, dev is down-counted in usb_unlink_urb().
^^
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 15:34:23 -0800, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > so let me restate it. Simply put, neither dev nor hcd are available
> > at the time urb->complete is called,
>
> Completely untrue. They are at a minimum provided through the URB itself,
> and giveback (which is t
On Saturday 22 January 2005 12:12 am, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:28:31 -0800, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > By the way ... on the topic of usbmon rather than changing
> > usbcore, is there a brief writeup of what you want this
> > new version to be doing -- and
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:28:31 -0800, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way ... on the topic of usbmon rather than changing
> usbcore, is there a brief writeup of what you want this
> new version to be doing -- and how? Like, why put the
> spy hooks in that location, rather than an
On Thursday 20 January 2005 11:35 am, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:08:34 -0800, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I do not like to refer to a dev because I do not quite understand where
> the necessary usb_dev_get/_put are now. But if you guarantee that the
> urb->dev is r
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:08:34 -0800, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 January 2005 7:42 am, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > Relying on pipe makes
> > tests dependant on URB only. No references to bus or HCD, therefore no
> > extra refcounts or worries about oopses. Al
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 7:42 am, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Relying on pipe makes
> tests dependant on URB only. No references to bus or HCD, therefore no
> extra refcounts or worries about oopses. Also, HC drivers zero out the
> urb->dev in giveback sequence which is a royal pain whe
Am Mittwoch, 19. Januar 2005 16:42 schrieb Pete Zaitcev:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:14:24 -0800, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > Also, I don't like the idea of scattering knowledge all over the place
> > > > that the root hub is always given address 1 ...
> >
> > which you didn
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:14:24 -0800, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Also, I don't like the idea of scattering knowledge all over the place
> > > that the root hub is always given address 1 ...
>
> which you didn't address yet.
Yes, I have to look why you do not like using the pi
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 3:07 pm, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:51:22 -0800, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thereby breaking usb on various systems ... by overwriting the root hub
> > status message data as part of bounce buffer handling. NOT a good idea!
> > Th
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:51:22 -0800, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thereby breaking usb on various systems ... by overwriting the root hub
> status message data as part of bounce buffer handling. NOT a good idea!
> Those patches were added for important reasons. (Or did you add som
If it is inline...
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Stephen J. Gowdy schrub am Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:17:01 -0800:
> [ fullquote of patch ]
>
> Please Don't Do That.
>
>
--
/+-\
|Stephen J. Gowdy |
Hi, Stephen J. Gowdy schrub am Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:17:01 -0800:
[ fullquote of patch ]
Please Don't Do That.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 08:49:22PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Hi, Harald:
>
> Back in June you mentioned that you use USBmon. I am thinking about giving
> this a second look. Where did you get the userland to drive it? There's no
> apparent link off linux-usb.org.
you don't actually need any us
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
From that angle, the tracing has to be in fact placed into HC drivers,
not into USB core (with attendant increase in overhead, I grant).
Placing it into usbfs borders on useless. The USB core might be
a good compromise if HC drivers are considered sufficiently solid.
That's true
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 11:46:42AM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 10:54:07 -0700
> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > As you already have the source code for the driver, it's probably much
> > easier just to modify the driver to have it spit out what it is doing
> > than try
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 10:54:07 -0700
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As you already have the source code for the driver, it's probably much
> easier just to modify the driver to have it spit out what it is doing
> than trying to intrepret a USB stream separate from the driver.
I do not agree. T
20 matches
Mail list logo
