> On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:58:56 -0500 (EST) Alan Stern
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > However, the fact that usblp_check_status() ignores -ENODEV and
> > > returns 0 (OK) to usblp_write() is not really a hit. Imho
> > > usblp_write() should get -ENODEV, release usblp->sem, drop
> > > everything
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:58:56 -0500 (EST) Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, the fact that usblp_check_status() ignores -ENODEV and returns
> > 0 (OK) to usblp_write() is not really a hit. Imho usblp_write() should
> > get -ENODEV, release usblp->sem, drop everything and let the dr
