Re: [linux-usb-devel] Request for testing: usb-storage autosuspend

2004-12-04 Thread Alan Stern
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004, Gerd v. Egidy wrote: > Sorry for the dumb question, but what does that mean for the non > usb-professional? Will it really spin down my disk or just put the usb > connection to it in suspend mode? It only puts the USB connection into suspend mode. If your drive decides that

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Request for testing: usb-storage autosuspend

2004-12-04 Thread Gerd v. Egidy
> > Cool! I'll have to take a look soon. (And at the hub autosuspend > > patch too...) It's bigger than I'd have expected. Care to sketch > > what those three patches do? > > It's a little bigger than it needs to be, because I took the opportunity > to reorder the #include lines in bunch of sou

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Request for testing: usb-storage autosuspend

2004-12-02 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, David Brownell wrote: > On Thursday 02 December 2004 9:22 am, Alan Stern wrote: > > Below is a composite of three patches pending for the usb-storage driver.   > > Together they provide support for autosuspend.  The inactivity timeout is > > controlled by a module parameter na

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Request for testing: usb-storage autosuspend

2004-12-02 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 02 December 2004 9:22 am, Alan Stern wrote: > Below is a composite of three patches pending for the usb-storage driver.   > Together they provide support for autosuspend.  The inactivity timeout is > controlled by a module parameter named "autosuspend"; its value gives the > timeout i

[linux-usb-devel] Request for testing: usb-storage autosuspend

2004-12-02 Thread Alan Stern
Below is a composite of three patches pending for the usb-storage driver. Together they provide support for autosuspend. The inactivity timeout is controlled by a module parameter named "autosuspend"; its value gives the timeout in seconds (0 means no autosuspend). If anyone can try this out