: Thomas Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Randy.Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, January 17, 2003 5:43 AM
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] USB PID question
>on 1/16/03 9:25 PM, Randy.Dunlap at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>&g
on 1/16/03 9:25 PM, Randy.Dunlap at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Thomas Chen wrote:
>
> | > like you say:v
> | > | so... if that is the case... from PC/host point of view... we SHOULD
> | > | never send out any packet that is has OUT bit set why am i seeing
> | > | BULK mes
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Thomas Chen wrote:
| > like you say:v
| > | so... if that is the case... from PC/host point of view... we SHOULD
| > | never send out any packet that is has OUT bit set why am i seeing
| > | BULK message being queued up with that bit set ???
| > |
| > | 0x8280
| > |
> like you say:v
> | so... if that is the case... from PC/host point of view... we SHOULD
> | never send out any packet that is has OUT bit set why am i seeing
> | BULK message being queued up with that bit set ???
> |
> | 0x8280
> | ^
> |
> | this starts happening when the usbseri
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, thomas chen wrote:
|
| i am not sure if i understand the PID stuff correctly after reading
| thru the code and some USB spec
|
| i thought from my limited reading that
| OUT - Function to HOST
| IN - HOST to Function
OUT: host to device
IN: device to host
It's basically PC-
i am not sure if i understand the PID stuff correctly after reading
thru the code and some USB spec
i thought from my limited reading that
OUT - Function to HOST
IN - HOST to Function
so... if that is the case... from PC/host point of view... we SHOULD
never send out any packet that is has OUT
