>From: Nitin Mahajan
>
>different manufacturers. Do all these cables fall
>under a particulas combination of device class and
>subclass?
You should be able to see that by doing an lsusb -v on
your device; it will dump the class/subclass codes--in
that case the best you could do is attach to an int
>> > My problem is that I want the driver binding to happen
>> > for all such kind of cable from different vendors and
>> > from new vendors also in future.
>>
>> I think you can use Device class & subclass instead of Vendor id/device
>> id.
>
> That assumes there IS a class. (And that those cost-
> Hi!
> I am writing a bulk transfer driver for data xfer
> through host-to-host xfer cable. I don't want to use
> the usbnet driver for the same. This driver is based
> on usb-skeleton.c and presently tested with PL-2301
> chips.
>
> My problem is that I want the driver binding to happen
> for
Hi!
I am writing a bulk transfer driver for data xfer
through host-to-host xfer cable. I don't want to use
the usbnet driver for the same. This driver is based
on usb-skeleton.c and presently tested with PL-2301
chips.
My problem is that I want the driver binding to happen
for all such kind of
