On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, gary clark wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> Thanks for the response. Basically I want to avoid the
> kernel driver modifications until next time.
> But your right it probably was easier to make the
> modification in usb_storage.
> By calling the usb_detach_kernel_driver_np on a
> specifi
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, gary clark wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> My thinking is that usb_storage has snagged the
> interface before I even get there. What options do I
> have to grabbing the interface? I'm already super user
> when I run my application.
I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to accomplish.
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 2. November 2005 02:21 schrieb gary clark:
> > I want to know that if I call usb_claim_interface will
> > in an application will this prevent a user from
> > attempting to mount that device? i.e state that the
> > device is busy.
> > Is there
Am Mittwoch, 2. November 2005 02:21 schrieb gary clark:
> I want to know that if I call usb_claim_interface will
> in an application will this prevent a user from
> attempting to mount that device? i.e state that the
> device is busy.
> Is there documentation out there that can point me in
> the ri
Hello,
I am writing an application in user space that uses
libusb.a.
I want to know that if I call usb_claim_interface will
in an application will this prevent a user from
attempting to mount that device? i.e state that the
device is busy.
Is there documentation out there that can point me in
the
