On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 12:29:21AM -0400, Kevin wrote:
> Yes, the patch for pre8 only has the ID for the two port device. This
> is the 0x2204 value that's #defined as USB_DEVICE_ID_ATEN_2PORTKVM. The
> value for my 4 port device is 0x2205, which I had to add to get my KVM
> to work.
Sorry, I j
Yes, the patch for pre8 only has the ID for the two port device. This
is the 0x2204 value that's #defined as USB_DEVICE_ID_ATEN_2PORTKVM. The
value for my 4 port device is 0x2205, which I had to add to get my KVM
to work.
Cheers,
-kevin
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 17:07, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, M
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 10:07:12PM -0400, Kevin wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I just got a 4-port IOGear KVM and quickly found that it didn't work
> with my linux machine. After doing some research I found out that the
> fix was suppose to be in the latest kernel (2.4.19-pre8). I installed
> that and
Greetings,
I just got a 4-port IOGear KVM and quickly found that it didn't work
with my linux machine. After doing some research I found out that the
fix was suppose to be in the latest kernel (2.4.19-pre8). I installed
that and that still didn't fix my problem. I looked through that patch
tha
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:47:58PM -0500, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Guys,
>
> The patch came about as offshot of my anti-usbkbd crusade.
> (Or shall I say Vojtech's anti-usbkbd policies? :)
:)))
> This patch is truly a kludge, but it seems to work.
> Some hardware by a certain company called "ATEN"
> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 09:51:14 -0800
> From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > it seems that nothing helps. So, I simply switched GET_REPORT off.
> > It works for the piece of junk that Red Hat bought for my testing,
> > and I got several "thank you" notes since we shipped the patch.
> A number
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:47:58PM -0500, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Guys,
>
> The patch came about as offshot of my anti-usbkbd crusade.
> (Or shall I say Vojtech's anti-usbkbd policies? :)
>
> This patch is truly a kludge, but it seems to work.
> Some hardware by a certain company called "ATEN" cra
Guys,
The patch came about as offshot of my anti-usbkbd crusade.
(Or shall I say Vojtech's anti-usbkbd policies? :)
This patch is truly a kludge, but it seems to work.
Some hardware by a certain company called "ATEN" crashes
if GET_REPORT is sent. I tried to modify our GET_REPORT, but
it seems t
