Thanks for all the replies. Looks like Still Image is the way to go.
--gmcnutt
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
> But what
> if the device snapped a new picture while it was mounted? How would the
> host filesystem learn about it without unmounting/remounting?
>
> With a "real" mass storage device like a disc drive the host f/s never
> has to worry about somebody else changing the media (I think!). All
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 12:56:00PM -0600, Gordon McNutt wrote:
> Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>
> > > From: Gordon McNutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 11:10:26 -0600
> >
> > > I've got to wondering about the mass storage profile, and how the host
> > > f/s keeps in synch. I assumed the
The general way camera manufacturers fix this problem is by disabling the
user interface on the camera when it's connected to the USB bus.
My DC290 just runs a pretty animation on the screen while it's
communicating. The only switches that work are on/off and "mode" (which
allows me to turn off
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > From: Gordon McNutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 11:10:26 -0600
>
> > I've got to wondering about the mass storage profile, and how the host
> > f/s keeps in synch. I assumed the typical usage scenario was that the
> > host would mount the device and get
> From: Gordon McNutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 11:10:26 -0600
> I've got to wondering about the mass storage profile, and how the host
> f/s keeps in synch. I assumed the typical usage scenario was that the
> host would mount the device and get access to stored pictures. But w
Hi,
My company has recently started work on a slave usb driver for a camera.
The camera f/w can support a mass storage profile as well as a digital
still imaging profile.
I've got to wondering about the mass storage profile, and how the host
f/s keeps in synch. I assumed the typical usage scenar
