Re: [linux-usb-devel] lsusb warnings in 2.4.22

2003-09-02 Thread David Brownell
Olaf Hering wrote: On Mon, Sep 01, David Brownell wrote: Olaf Hering wrote: Good morning, who is mainaining lsusb these days? I recently sent a patch to Thomas Sailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, which he reports is now merged into CVS. ... Where is this CVS? I sent him a mail once, but it bounced,

Re: [linux-usb-devel] lsusb warnings in 2.4.22

2003-09-02 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 07:08:35 -0700 David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Olaf Hering wrote: | > Good morning, | > | > who is mainaining lsusb these days? | | I recently sent a patch to Thomas Sailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, which | he reports is now merged into CVS. Fixes problems like: | |

Re: [linux-usb-devel] lsusb warnings in 2.4.22

2003-09-02 Thread Olaf Hering
On Mon, Sep 01, David Brownell wrote: > Olaf Hering wrote: > >Good morning, > > > >who is mainaining lsusb these days? > > I recently sent a patch to Thomas Sailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, which > he reports is now merged into CVS. Fixes problems like: > > - no parsing for common CDC class descr

Re: [linux-usb-devel] lsusb warnings in 2.4.22

2003-09-01 Thread David Brownell
Olaf Hering wrote: Good morning, who is mainaining lsusb these days? I recently sent a patch to Thomas Sailer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, which he reports is now merged into CVS. Fixes problems like: - no parsing for common CDC class descriptors, - way-too-short control timeouts, - unforgiving (an

[linux-usb-devel] lsusb warnings in 2.4.22

2003-09-01 Thread Olaf Hering
Good morning, who is mainaining lsusb these days? There are several bugreports like this: usbdevfs: process 17978 (lsusb) did not claim interface 0 before use What does it mean? Is the application broken? If so, how can it be fixed? -- USB is for mice, FireWire is for men! sUse lINUX ag, nÜRN