Duncan Sands wrote:
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 22:53, David Brownell wrote:
Duncan Sands wrote:
(1) is there any speed advantage to submitting multiple urbs to
a bulk endpoint, as compared to using a single urb which is
resubmitted in its completion handler?
Yes, most noticeably at high spe
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 22:53, David Brownell wrote:
> Duncan Sands wrote:
> > (1) is there any speed advantage to submitting multiple urbs to
> > a bulk endpoint, as compared to using a single urb which is
> > resubmitted in its completion handler?
>
> Yes, most noticeably at high speed where
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 17:04, Duncan Sands wrote:
> (1) is there any speed advantage to submitting multiple urbs to
> a bulk endpoint, as compared to using a single urb which is
> resubmitted in its completion handler?
> (2) is there a noticeable speed difference if you send a buffer
> in many
Duncan Sands wrote:
(1) is there any speed advantage to submitting multiple urbs to
a bulk endpoint, as compared to using a single urb which is
resubmitted in its completion handler?
Yes, most noticeably at high speed where the time to report
the completion and resubmit the urb can easily be eno
(1) is there any speed advantage to submitting multiple urbs to
a bulk endpoint, as compared to using a single urb which is
resubmitted in its completion handler?
(2) is there a noticeable speed difference if you send a buffer
in many small pieces (-> many urb submissions) as compared
to sending it
