Re: [linux-usb-devel] short descriptor reads

2002-03-26 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 11:09:20AM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > Well, the device certainly "works on Windows". > > But I don't have Win2K so I can't consider any > of the tools at > > http://www.usb.org/developers/tools.html > > for further testing. Until you (or someone else) can verify

Re: [linux-usb-devel] short descriptor reads

2002-03-26 Thread Stuart DJ Lynne
> I've got a device (production model, not that new) which > seems to be acting strangely when usb.c requests a string > descriptor. The way it's supposed to act is defined in the > USB 2.0 spec, section 9.4.3: > > If the descriptor is shorter than the wLength field, the > device indica

Re: [linux-usb-devel] short descriptor reads

2002-03-26 Thread David Brownell
ot;David Brownell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:52 AM Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] short descriptor reads > On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 10:49:40PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > > I've got a device (production model, no

Re: [linux-usb-devel] short descriptor reads

2002-03-26 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 10:49:40PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > I've got a device (production model, not that new) which > seems to be acting strangely when usb.c requests a string > descriptor. Does this device pass the "Windows USB validation tools"? (sorry, don't remember the exact name of t

[linux-usb-devel] short descriptor reads

2002-03-26 Thread David Brownell
I've got a device (production model, not that new) which seems to be acting strangely when usb.c requests a string descriptor. The way it's supposed to act is defined in the USB 2.0 spec, section 9.4.3: If the descriptor is shorter than the wLength field, the device indicates the end of