On 2 Jun 2004, Len Brown wrote:
> > If you're interested, I can explain why 2.6.4 started masking the
> > USBSTS_HCH bit from the status register before testing whether to handle
> > the interrupt.
>
> USBSTS_HCH doesn't sound like a valid interrupt indicator anyway right?
The documentation is
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 12:38, Alan Stern wrote:
> On 2 Jun 2004, Len Brown wrote:
>
> > Has anybody seen USB interrupts increase
> > with no USB devices attached? Seems to be
> > related to Ethernet activity on a different IRQ.
> >
> > Only in IOAPIC mode; only on the VIA133/266 chipsets.
> >
>
On 2 Jun 2004, Len Brown wrote:
> Has anybody seen USB interrupts increase
> with no USB devices attached? Seems to be
> related to Ethernet activity on a different IRQ.
>
> Only in IOAPIC mode; only on the VIA133/266 chipsets.
>
> http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2243
>
> I'm stumped.
>
Has anybody seen USB interrupts increase
with no USB devices attached? Seems to be
related to Ethernet activity on a different IRQ.
Only in IOAPIC mode; only on the VIA133/266 chipsets.
http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2243
I'm stumped.
thanks,
-Len
---
