Once it's initialized I see no reason it should be touched
ever again.
- Original Message -
From: "Oliver Neukum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David Brownell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 3:36 PM
Subject
On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 12:40:03AM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Friday 01 March 2002 22:25, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 04:29:21PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > here is an attempt at using the slab cache for urbs.
> > > Could somebody with a 2.0 devices test
On Friday 01 March 2002 21:40, David Brownell wrote:
> > #--- 1.45/include/linux/usb.h Fri Feb 22 19:50:06 2002
> > #+++ 1.46/include/linux/usb.h Fri Mar 1 16:03:48 2002
> > #@@ -720,6 +720,7 @@
> > # {
> > # spinlock_t lock; /* lock for the URB */
> > # atomic_t count; /* reference count of the
On Friday 01 March 2002 22:25, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 04:29:21PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > here is an attempt at using the slab cache for urbs.
> > Could somebody with a 2.0 devices test this ?
>
> Looks like you only did it for iso urbs, right?
Then a ! is mis
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 04:29:21PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is an attempt at using the slab cache for urbs.
> Could somebody with a 2.0 devices test this ?
Looks like you only did it for iso urbs, right?
I don't think the 2.0 controller can handle iso packets yet, not to
mentio
> #--- 1.45/include/linux/usb.h Fri Feb 22 19:50:06 2002
> #+++ 1.46/include/linux/usb.h Fri Mar 1 16:03:48 2002
> #@@ -720,6 +720,7 @@
> # {
> # spinlock_t lock; /* lock for the URB */
> # atomic_t count; /* reference count of the URB */
> #+ int is_iso; /* flag to handle as iso */
You know, it
Hi,
here is an attempt at using the slab cache for urbs.
Could somebody with a 2.0 devices test this ?
Regards
Oliver
This BitKeeper patch contains the following changesets:
1.364
# This is a BitKeeper patch. What follows are the unified diffs for the
# set of deltas c
