On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 01:54:42PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > So can you send this again, for just usb_submit_urb() with the sum of
> > the changes that you and David agreed on?
>
> Sure. Here's the most basic patch.
> Much thanks to Dave who had prepared the hcd layer already.
> Dave, do
> Sure. Here's the most basic patch.
> Much thanks to Dave who had prepared the hcd layer already.
> Dave, do you like it ?
Looks right, except for omitting kerneldoc for the new
usb_submit_urb() parameter. Thanks for switching to
use a more meaningful name ... :)
- Dave
> Of course, it'll bre
> So can you send this again, for just usb_submit_urb() with the sum of
> the changes that you and David agreed on?
Sure. Here's the most basic patch.
Much thanks to Dave who had prepared the hcd layer already.
Dave, do you like it ?
Of course, it'll break all drivers except hub and all hcds not
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 03:42:19PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a tested patch which introduces a gfp field to usb_submit_urb
> and usb_alloc_urb. The changes to hcd.c are incomplete. They just
> allow it to compile. I've tested on UP and OHCI.
Hm, let's do just one thing at a t
Hi,
this is a tested patch which introduces a gfp field to usb_submit_urb
and usb_alloc_urb. The changes to hcd.c are incomplete. They just
allow it to compile. I've tested on UP and OHCI.
Regards
Oliver
--- drivers/usb/hub.c.alt Fri Feb 1 16:41:16 2002
+++ driver
