On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, David Brownell wrote:
> Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > What do you think about the problem of stalling the bulk-out endpoint when
> > the host sends too much data? Maybe this hasn't caused you any
> > difficulty yet. The problem is that there's a race.
>
> What'd be the conseq
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Todd Fischer wrote:
> Since there is a race condition, I would recommend changing the code where
> the race condition occurs to get rid of it forever. Using the no-stall
> option my cause reasonable use of stall to be disabled as well.
>
> Also, on the Linux 2.4 driver, it s
Alan Stern wrote:
What do you think about the problem of stalling the bulk-out endpoint when
the host sends too much data? Maybe this hasn't caused you any
difficulty yet. The problem is that there's a race.
What'd be the consequence of just not using bulk stalls?
- Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Diego Dompe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 2:42 PM
> To: Alan Stern
>
> > What do you think about the problem of stalling the bulk-out
> endpoint when
> > the host sends too much data? Maybe this hasn't caused you any
> > difficulty
Alan,
On Tue, 2004-07-27 at 15:49 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> That's a problem in the controller driver. Which driver are you using?
> It should include something like this in its usb_gadget_register_driver()
> routine (this is copied from net2280.c):
>
> dev->gadget.dev.driver = &driver
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Diego Dompe wrote:
> The driver registration logic was producing the kernel to get NULL
> pointer references.
See below.
> > You moved the code that registers the LUN devices into
> > fsg_bind(). This change looks correct; although there is
> > a comment stating
Hi Alan,
> What was wrong with the registration logic and how did it crash your
> kernel? In your patch I see two changes:
The driver registration logic was producing the kernel to get NULL
pointer references.
> You moved the code that registers the LUN devices into
> fsg_bind().
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Todd Fischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We ran into a few problems trying to use file backed storage on 2.6.
What were your problems?
> Attached is the patch file to the 1.9 version of the Linux 2.6
> file_storage.c file, which makes the following changes:
>
> - Fix the registration
