Re: [linux-usb-devel] [GIT PATCH] More USB patches for 2.6.18

2006-09-29 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, David Brownell wrote: > On Thursday 28 September 2006 5:20 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:08:33 -0700 > > David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > ... reviewing and testing those new OHCI changes is still on my > > > list; > > > > erm, we pref

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [GIT PATCH] More USB patches for 2.6.18

2006-09-28 Thread Horst H. von Brand
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > That's the "some gccs dont like static function decls in that scope" thing. > > I fixed it (unpleasantly) like this: > > > diff -puN drivers/usb/host/ohci-hub.c~ohci-add-auto-stop-support-hack-hack > drivers/usb/host/ohci-hub.c > --- a/drivers/

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [GIT PATCH] More USB patches for 2.6.18

2006-09-28 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 28 September 2006 5:20 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:08:33 -0700 > David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ... reviewing and testing those new OHCI changes is still on my > > list; > > erm, we prefer to do that before code hits mainline. Exactly why I ment

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [GIT PATCH] More USB patches for 2.6.18

2006-09-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:08:33 -0700 David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-hub.c~ohci-add-auto-stop-support-hack-hack > > +++ a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-hub.c > > @@ -132,6 +132,10 @@ static inline struct ed *find_head (stru > > return ed; > > } > > > > +#ifde

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [GIT PATCH] More USB patches for 2.6.18

2006-09-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:05:24 -0700 Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM > > +static int ohci_restart(struct ohci_hcd *ohci); > > +#endif > > That #ifdef shouldn't be even needed. We'll get "warning: 'ohci_restart' declared 'static' but never defined" without it. --

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [GIT PATCH] More USB patches for 2.6.18

2006-09-28 Thread David Brownell
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-hub.c~ohci-add-auto-stop-support-hack-hack > +++ a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-hub.c > @@ -132,6 +132,10 @@ static inline struct ed *find_head (stru > return ed; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM > +static int ohci_restart(struct ohci_hcd *ohci); > +#endif > + > /* caller

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [GIT PATCH] More USB patches for 2.6.18

2006-09-28 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:05:24PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 04:59:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:40:23 -0700 (PDT) > > Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > > > Here are

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [GIT PATCH] More USB patches for 2.6.18

2006-09-28 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 04:59:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:40:23 -0700 (PDT) > Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > Here are some more USB bugfixes and device ids 2.6.18. They should all > > > fix th

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [GIT PATCH] More USB patches for 2.6.18

2006-09-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Here are some more USB bugfixes and device ids 2.6.18. They should all > > fix the reported problems in your current tree (if not, please let me > > know.) > > >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [GIT PATCH] More USB patches for 2.6.18

2006-09-28 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 04:40:23PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Here are some more USB bugfixes and device ids 2.6.18. They should all > > fix the reported problems in your current tree (if not, please let me > > know.) > > > > All of these chan

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [GIT PATCH] More USB patches for 2.6.18

2006-09-28 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006, Greg KH wrote: > > Here are some more USB bugfixes and device ids 2.6.18. They should all > fix the reported problems in your current tree (if not, please let me > know.) > > All of these changes have been in the -mm tree for a while. Maybe I shouldn't have hurried you.