Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bad description for USB Monitor (USB_MON)

2005-05-23 Thread randy_dunlap
On Tue, 24 May 2005 00:01:55 -0400 (EDT) Alan Stern wrote: | On Mon, 23 May 2005, randy_dunlap wrote: | | > On Mon, 23 May 2005 17:53:53 -0700 Jeff Carr wrote: | > | > | The text for the USB_MON option is confusing as to what was intended. | > | (This was from linux-2.6.11-rc4-git7) | > | | >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bad description for USB Monitor (USB_MON)

2005-05-23 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 23 May 2005, randy_dunlap wrote: > On Mon, 23 May 2005 17:53:53 -0700 Jeff Carr wrote: > > | The text for the USB_MON option is confusing as to what was intended. > | (This was from linux-2.6.11-rc4-git7) > | > | Jeff > > > |USB Monitor (USB_MON) [M/n/?] (NEW) ? > > Does simply c

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bad description for USB Monitor (USB_MON)

2005-05-23 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Mon, 23 May 2005 17:53:53 -0700, Jeff Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The text for the USB_MON option is confusing as to what was intended. Any suggestions? -- Pete --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bad description for USB Monitor (USB_MON)

2005-05-23 Thread randy_dunlap
On Mon, 23 May 2005 17:53:53 -0700 Jeff Carr wrote: | The text for the USB_MON option is confusing as to what was intended. | (This was from linux-2.6.11-rc4-git7) | | Jeff |USB Monitor (USB_MON) [M/n/?] (NEW) ? Does simply changing this to USB Traffic Monitor (USB_MON) ... help?