Re: [linux-usb-devel] Differences between the two kernel trees

2001-10-06 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 06:48:50PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 05:41:59PM -0400, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > > From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 11:37:50 -0700 > > > > > hub.c | 78 > > > hub.h

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Differences between the two kernel trees

2001-10-06 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 05:41:59PM -0400, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 11:37:50 -0700 > > > hub.c | 78 > > hub.h | 17 > > The bulk of it is my semaphore that Alan adopted. L

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Differences between the two kernel trees

2001-10-02 Thread Alan Cox
> The following snippet is curious (Alan's tree has the unlock): > > @@ -845,7 +838,6 @@ > > dbg("usb_hub_thread exiting"); > > - unlock_kernel(); > complete_and_exit(&khubd_exited, 0); > } > > I have no idea what is right, above. I believe the unlock is right - its bas

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Differences between the two kernel trees

2001-10-02 Thread Pete Zaitcev
> From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 11:37:50 -0700 > hub.c | 78 > hub.h | 17 The bulk of it is my semaphore that Alan adopted. Linus swore like a sailor when he saw it, so it did not go in. The following s

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Differences between the two kernel trees

2001-10-01 Thread Georg Acher
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 02:03:59PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:48:59PM +0200, Georg Acher wrote: > > > > For usb-uhci/uhci all of the changes (as far I can see) touch the > > uhci-common.h, which appeared and vanished again in 2.4.10-pre*. So I would > > consider Linus' ver

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Differences between the two kernel trees

2001-10-01 Thread Dmitri
On Mon, 2001-10-01 at 13:41, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 12:29:55PM -0700, Dmitri wrote: > > I have one minor patch outstanding, though (hotplugging fix). It should > > be one line change in ibmcam.c and ultracam.c files - when it is ready. > > Ok, then I will leave the video files

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Differences between the two kernel trees

2001-10-01 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:48:59PM +0200, Georg Acher wrote: > > For usb-uhci/uhci all of the changes (as far I can see) touch the > uhci-common.h, which appeared and vanished again in 2.4.10-pre*. So I would > consider Linus' version more up-to-date. But I miss my anti-crash fix for > usb-uhci..

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Differences between the two kernel trees

2001-10-01 Thread Georg Acher
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 11:37:50AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > Hi all, > > In looking at the drivers/usb trees between 2.4.11-pre1 and 2.4.10-ac2, > I see a lot of differences. Some drivers are newer in one tree and not > the other and there are new files in the -ac tree. For usb-uhci/uhci all of t

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Differences between the two kernel trees

2001-10-01 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 12:29:55PM -0700, Dmitri wrote: > > I think these patches will be merged into Linus's tree automagically, > like it happened in 2.4.10 cycle with usbvideo code - when Alan ships > mega-patches to Linus. There is no point in races of identical patches, > unless one wants to

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Differences between the two kernel trees

2001-10-01 Thread Dmitri
On Mon, 2001-10-01 at 11:37, Greg KH wrote: > In looking at the drivers/usb trees between 2.4.11-pre1 and > 2.4.10-ac2, I see a lot of differences. Some drivers are newer > in one tree and not the other and there are new files in > the -ac tree. > > I'd like to sort this all out soon, as it mak