On Sunday 12 December 2004 4:28 pm, Rob Browning wrote:
> David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > That last point says to me there are some strange timing
> > issues lurking. But transfer rates under 10 Mbyte/sec
> > have so far seemed best explained by drive adapter issues.
>
> In case
David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If I place an older 5400rpm 20GB Maxtor in the enclosure, create one
>> large partition, and then execute "mke2fs -j /dev/uba1", the mke2fs
>> command takes 5 minutes or more to run, and the CPU remains pegged at
>> 100% throughout. This is on an Athl
David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Ahh. I didn't realize there was a choice. What's the proper way to
>> manage the selection? Is it just a traditional "make sure you load
>> the right module" issue?
>
> I think you have to actually disable "ub" in Kconfig.
> At least, unless/until "
David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think you have to actually disable "ub" in Kconfig.
> At least, unless/until "ub" starts to talk scatterlists.
With usb-storage, the performance is vastly better. The bonnie++
numbers are perhaps 4 to 5 times higher (over 20MB/s in the relevant
case
On Monday 13 December 2004 8:59 am, Rob Browning wrote:
> >
> > Sounds like you should use usb-storage instead of "ub".
>
> Ahh. I didn't realize there was a choice. What's the proper way to
> manage the selection? Is it just a traditional "make sure you load
> the right module" issue?
I think
