Re: [linux-usb-devel] More about autoresume

2007-03-16 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Freitag, 16. März 2007 20:46 schrieb Alan Stern: > > Here's a patch to implement all this.  I'm still not crazy about the idea > > of disabling autoresume, but I can see that some people might want to do > > it occasionally. > > > > This patch is m

Re: [linux-usb-devel] More about autoresume

2007-03-16 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Freitag, 16. März 2007 20:46 schrieb Alan Stern: > Here's a patch to implement all this.  I'm still not crazy about the idea > of disabling autoresume, but I can see that some people might want to do > it occasionally. > > This patch is meant to go on top of Greg's latest development patchset

Re: [linux-usb-devel] More about autoresume

2007-03-16 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2007 14:31 schrieb Alan Stern: > > Oliver: > > > > Suppose the superuser has suspended a USB device and disabled autoresume. > > Then what should happen under the following circumstances? > > > > 1. The device's usbfs file

Re: [linux-usb-devel] More about autoresume

2007-03-15 Thread Alan Stern
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2007 14:31 schrieb Alan Stern: > > Oliver: > > > > Suppose the superuser has suspended a USB device and disabled autoresume. > > Then what should happen under the following circumstances? > > > > 1. The device's usbfs file

Re: [linux-usb-devel] More about autoresume

2007-03-15 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2007 14:31 schrieb Alan Stern: > Oliver: > > Suppose the superuser has suspended a USB device and disabled autoresume. > Then what should happen under the following circumstances? > > 1. The device's usbfs file is opened (or already was open > and now gets