Re: [linux-usb-devel] Speedtouch and request_firmware

2004-09-28 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 08:44 +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Phil, the main difficulty with the kernel driver is getting a pppoa > aware pppd. Also, the website is out of date. However once it is set > up it does have some advantages - lower latency and lower overhead (only > important for old mac

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Speedtouch and request_firmware

2004-09-27 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 22:53 -0700, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > David Woodhouse wrote: > > The speedtch driver offended me by needing a userspace tool 'modem_run' > > to load its firmware and -- worse -- to monitor the line state as a > > dÃmon too. > > > > So I tried to convert it to use request_firmwa

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Speedtouch and request_firmware

2004-09-27 Thread Duncan Sands
On Tuesday 28 September 2004 07:53, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > David Woodhouse wrote: > > The speedtch driver offended me by needing a userspace tool 'modem_run' > > to load its firmware and -- worse -- to monitor the line state as a > > dÃmon too. > > > > So I tried to convert it to use request_firmw

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Speedtouch and request_firmware

2004-09-27 Thread Phil Dibowitz
David Woodhouse wrote: The speedtch driver offended me by needing a userspace tool 'modem_run' to load its firmware and -- worse -- to monitor the line state as a dÃmon too. So I tried to convert it to use request_firmware() and monitor the line for itself. The results are below -- but it doesn't a