On Sunday 28 January 2007 12:54 pm, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, jing xiang wrote:
>
> > Got the idea. But could we re-use the current gadget drivers in such
> > architecture? Is it possible to make the composite layer transparent
> > to the function drivers?
Those are the two questi
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, jing xiang wrote:
> Got the idea. But could we re-use the current gadget drivers in such
> architecture? Is it possible to make the composite layer transparent
> to the function drivers? In theory, the composite layer could get all
> the descriptor/configuration/interface info
he problem??
>
> - Dave
>
>
>
> > Thanks!
> > Jing
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > David Brownell
> > Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 2:18 PM
> >
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> David Brownell
> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 2:18 PM
> To: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Skip Rafferty; Alan Stern
> Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Support for Multiple USB Gadgets
>
>
ECTED] On Behalf Of
David Brownell
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 2:18 PM
To: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Skip Rafferty; Alan Stern
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Support for Multiple USB Gadgets
On Thursday 05 October 2006 8:00 am, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> There's no reaso
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Skip Rafferty wrote:
> A peripheral controller driver that supports multiple
> USB gadgets could be useful.
No it wouldn't, because there is no peripheral controller hardware that
can control multiple gadgets!
> I realize this doesn't exist in the Linux 2.6 gadget
> framewor
