Am Donnerstag, 6. Januar 2005 21:12 schrieb Ð:
> I use 2.6.10 kernel and pppd-2.4.3 on Fedora Core 3 distr.
> I configure my pppd to connect to internet via 3Com 56k Business Modem (USB).
> Everything is fine.
> But when i want disconnect from internet i do: 'killall pppd'.
> Dialup connection
On Thursday 28 October 2004 00:26, Mohan V wrote:
> I wanted to know what is meant by "no modules for USB product."
It could be as simple as: you statically linked that
module, so the userspace hotplug tools don't know
about it.
I'm a bit surprised that any version of the old "usb-char"
driver
Am Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 2004 09:26 schrieb Mohan V:
> --
> I wanted to know what is meant by "no modules for USB product." I have
> set my vendor and product ID as 0786 & 1235 resp. Also I get an entry
> for my device in /proc/bus/usb/devices.
With acm bound to it?
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
In 2.6.0-test4, USB ELSA modem no longer works. This is UHCI (on
toshiba 4030cdt).
Relevant messages seem to be:
PM: Adding info for usb:1-1.2
drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c: need inactive config#2
PM: Adding info for usb:1-1.2:0
drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c: need inactive con
On Tue, 2002-05-21 at 21:57, Ben Simkin wrote:
> I'll be setting up a DirecPC USB Modem tomorrow.
> Could I have a program that captures data from the USB Port (if
> possible), so I can log it.
> I'll hav a look at the data, and pass it on to someone in the group who
> wants to hav a look also.
>
Hi!
> > Is st7554 based chipset stMicroelectronic usb modem supported by linux
> > 2.4.0?
>
> No, it's a USB-soundchip with line interface, ie. a Winmodem in the ugliest
> sense...
It is not *ugly*. At least it is documented. The fact that it is
pretty hard to support this is not relevant.
It
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 05:25:58PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is st7554 based chipset stMicroelectronic usb modem supported by linux
> 2.4.0?
No, it's a USB-soundchip with line interface, ie. a Winmodem in the ugliest
sense...
Quoting from the data sheet:
"The ST7554 is a single chip hos
Brad Hards wrote:
>
> Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have the following USB Modem, as you can see below it appears to
> > be Comm class but it isn't being claimed by the acm driver. But that
> > doesn't necessarily supprise me as the are other sub classes (I think)
> > of the com
Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have the following USB Modem, as you can see below it appears to
> be Comm class but it isn't being claimed by the acm driver. But that
> doesn't necessarily supprise me as the are other sub classes (I think)
> of the comm class that aren't necessarily acm
