On 5/1/07, Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Bret Towe wrote:
>
> > I tested a de61 so far on an amd64 (previous testing was on a i386) and
> > its working when I grabbed a few scanners to do testing tonight I
> > apparently missed grabbing a de64 so I'll test that tomor
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Bret Towe wrote:
> I tested a de61 so far on an amd64 (previous testing was on a i386) and
> its working when I grabbed a few scanners to do testing tonight I
> apparently missed grabbing a de64 so I'll test that tomorrow
Please let me know, thanks.
> and at the moment it
On 4/30/07, Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the report - it clearly shows that Cypress produces different
> > hardware with different report descriptors, all broken in a very similar
> > way (improper order of usage minimum and maximu
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Thanks for the report - it clearly shows that Cypress produces different
> hardware with different report descriptors, all broken in a very similar
> way (improper order of usage minimum and maximum items), but not
> identical. This would require more ge
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Bret Towe wrote:
> accutally as soon as i had sent off that previous email I went looking
> for scanners to make sure they all worked or not the below is what i got
> with a 61
> [ 135.479986] usbhid 1-1:1.0: usb_probe_interface
> [ 135.479986] usbhid 1-1:1.0: usb_probe_in
On 4/30/07, Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Bret Towe wrote:
>
> > where is your tree? or could I get a copy of the cleaned up patch?
>
> My tree is hid.git on git.kernel.org. The cleaned up patch is not yet
> there, I will send it to you when I commit it. I am waiting
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Bret Towe wrote:
> where is your tree? or could I get a copy of the cleaned up patch?
My tree is hid.git on git.kernel.org. The cleaned up patch is not yet
there, I will send it to you when I commit it. I am waiting for more of
your feedback so that I put support for all p
On 4/30/07, Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Bret Towe wrote:
>
> > > Please try the patch below (against 2.6.21), it could solve your
> > > problem. If it does, I would be interested in all other product IDs
> > > you are able to reproduce this bug with, so that I can
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Bret Towe wrote:
> > Please try the patch below (against 2.6.21), it could solve your
> > problem. If it does, I would be interested in all other product IDs
> > you are able to reproduce this bug with, so that I can prepare proper
> > patch, handling all cypress hardware w
On 4/30/07, Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007, Bret Towe wrote:
>
> > > There might be various reasons for this, most probably the report
> > > descriptor of the device is broken. It might then be easy to fix the
> > > report descriptor on the fly before it gets parsed, w
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007, Bret Towe wrote:
> > There might be various reasons for this, most probably the report
> > descriptor of the device is broken. It might then be easy to fix the
> > report descriptor on the fly before it gets parsed, we are doing this
> > for various broken hardware already.
On 4/29/07, Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Bret Towe wrote:
>
> > > currently on 2.6.20.7 by data being processed you mean what should
> > > appear on screen in this case? ill update my laptop to .21 and add the
> > > debug items in the mean time ill just attach the u
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Bret Towe wrote:
> > currently on 2.6.20.7 by data being processed you mean what should
> > appear on screen in this case? ill update my laptop to .21 and add the
> > debug items in the mean time ill just attach the usbmon logs of the
> > plugin between upgrade and somethin
On 4/27/07, Bret Towe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/27/07, Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Bret Towe wrote:
>
> > For some time now at a place I work at we have been using some Unitech
> > MS-180 barcode scanners todo logins the work around we had in place
> > basi
On 4/27/07, Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Bret Towe wrote:
> For some time now at a place I work at we have been using some Unitech
> MS-180 barcode scanners todo logins the work around we had in place
> basicly was using a 2.4 kernel on the thin clients doing the l
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Bret Towe wrote:
> For some time now at a place I work at we have been using some Unitech
> MS-180 barcode scanners todo logins the work around we had in place
> basicly was using a 2.4 kernel on the thin clients doing the logins
> since 2.4 worked with them 2.6 had some is
16 matches
Mail list logo
