David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 13 December 2004 12:10 pm, Thomas Dodd wrote:
Did some more digging. Built 2.6.9-1.6_FC with CONFIG_USB_DEBUG=y and
ehci_hcd :00:08.2: init command 010009 (park)=0 ithresh=1 period=256 RUN
ehci_hcd :00:08.2: USB 2.0 enabled, EHCI 0.95, driver 2004-May-10
ehc
On Monday 13 December 2004 12:10 pm, Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
> Did some more digging. Built 2.6.9-1.6_FC with CONFIG_USB_DEBUG=y and
> found an older 2.6.5-1.358 kernel.
>
> With the 2.6.5 kernel, I still see:
> ehci_hcd :00:08.2: USB 2.0 enabled, EHCI 0.95, driver 2003-Dec-29
> hub 1-0:1.0: ov
Thomas Dodd wrote:
David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 06 December 2004 11:53 am, Thomas Dodd wrote:
It loads, the I get:
ehci_hcd :00:08.2: USB 2.0 enabled, EHCI 0.95, driver 2004-May-10"
hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found
hub 1-0:1.0: 4 ports detected
ehci_hcd :00:08.2: fatal error
ehci_hcd :00:
David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 14 December 2004 12:40 pm, you wrote:
Should I try removing the changes in ehci-hcd.c that is marked "turn off
port power on all root hub ports" then? Or maybe it the
writel(0,&ehci->regs->inter_enable) call after the ehci_reset() there?
Maybe just disable key ch
David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 06 December 2004 11:53 am, Thomas Dodd wrote:
Where can I find a list of problems with the VT6202?
VIA hasn't been forthcoming ... we can do no better! :)
I mean know issues with the VIA chip and the linux driver.
The current mailing list isn't the most searchable,
On Monday 06 December 2004 11:53 am, Thomas Dodd wrote:
>
> Where can I find a list of problems with the VT6202?
VIA hasn't been forthcoming ... we can do no better! :)
The main issue I've had with it has been timing-related
problems, related to queue processing, and a patch I'll
post later tod