On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Tommi Kyntola wrote:
> Actually we're using both, but the 300MHz I was referring to earlier has ohci.
>
> I read through the control message handling again, and while I was searching
> for timeouts earlier this time I checked the transfer size manipulation and
> indeed
> it p
Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Tommi Kyntola wrote:
(I'm not on the list, so please cc me replies)
IN SHORT:
I'm experiencing some weird behavior when sending control messages
to USB endpoints using usb(dev)fs ioctls. Firstly, 2.6 is significantly
slower than 2.4 (by a factor of 4). Se
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Tommi Kyntola wrote:
> (I'm not on the list, so please cc me replies)
>
> IN SHORT:
> I'm experiencing some weird behavior when sending control messages
> to USB endpoints using usb(dev)fs ioctls. Firstly, 2.6 is significantly
> slower than 2.4 (by a factor of 4). Secondly, co
