From: "Greg KH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Please do a 2.5.36 version, as I just modified every USB driver in that
> release.
Crap! I even downloaded it this morning, and still forgot. Will do.
..Stu
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: AMD -
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 02:43:48PM -0400, Stuart MacDonald wrote:
>
> I've put up the individual patches against 5.24 in the meantime, but
> I'll do up a 5.35 set right now. Might take me a while though.
> ftp://ftp.connecttech.com/pub/usb
Please do a 2.5.36 version, as I just modified every USB
From: "Greg KH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> No, the problem was that HZ changed in 5.25, and I wasn't using it in
> the call to usb_control_msg(). Here's the patch that fixes the problem,
> and now my whiteheat device works just fine.
Sheesh, that was simple. I probably shoulda noticed that when I loo
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 08:16:42PM -0400, Stuart MacDonald wrote:
>
> Greg thinks it's the queueing changes between 5.24 and 5.25, but he
> hasn't had time to look at it.
No, the problem was that HZ changed in 5.25, and I wasn't using it in
the call to usb_control_msg(). Here's the patch that f
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 08:16:42PM -0400, Stuart MacDonald wrote:
>
> Greg thinks it's the queueing changes between 5.24 and 5.25, but he
> hasn't had time to look at it.
I'm going to try to look at this tomorrow (Wed) and will let you know
what I find. Dave, this problem started happening when
From: "David Brownell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I meant among other things "what CPU". The text you sent by originally
Ah.
Sep 17 12:14:33 moll kernel: CPU0: Intel 00/07 stepping 03
/proc/cpuinfo attached below. PII 500 I think.
> included "-100", not "-110", which isn't an error code USB return
From: "David Brownell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ... is still not informative. "-100" means "-ENETDOWN" on my system,
> but no HCD returns that code. What architecture?
Not sure what you mean "what architecture". This happens on both uhci
and ohci as demonstrated by the more complete messages attac
