Am Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2007 17:09 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Wed, 9 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 23:59 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > >
> > > > Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 20:59 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > > > > 2. I would prefer to h
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 23:59 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> >
> > > Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 20:59 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > > > 2. I would prefer to have exclusion between open and reset, too.
> > > >
> > > > Why?
Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 23:59 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 20:59 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > > 2. I would prefer to have exclusion between open and reset, too.
> > >
> > > Why? I can understand wanting exclusion between read/write a
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 20:59 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > 2. I would prefer to have exclusion between open and reset, too.
> >
> > Why? I can understand wanting exclusion between read/write and reset.
> > But there's no obvious reason to make open and
Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 21:01 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 18:59 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > How do you like this approach?
> >
> > I changed my mind. An rwsem is a good idea.
> >
> > Regards
> > Oliver
>
> Glad
Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 20:59 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > 2. I would prefer to have exclusion between open and reset, too.
>
> Why? I can understand wanting exclusion between read/write and reset.
> But there's no obvious reason to make open and reset exclusive.
I don't think we'd want mutual exc
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 18:59 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > How do you like this approach?
>
> I changed my mind. An rwsem is a good idea.
>
> Regards
> Oliver
Glad to hear it. One might even go so far as to say that the char device
reg
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 18:59 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > But first, I think we should be able to get rid of the skel_open_lock
> > mutex plus similar mutexes in other USB drivers. The problem they address
> > is the race between open() and disconnect() --
Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 18:59 schrieb Alan Stern:
> How do you like this approach?
I changed my mind. An rwsem is a good idea.
Regards
Oliver
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download
Am Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 18:59 schrieb Alan Stern:
> But first, I think we should be able to get rid of the skel_open_lock
> mutex plus similar mutexes in other USB drivers. The problem they address
> is the race between open() and disconnect() -- or more accurately, open()
> and unregister_dev().
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this shows how the anchors can be used for doing reset support.
> Hibernate, when we get it should be similar.
I'll have more comments on this later.
But first, I think we should be able to get rid of the skel_open_lock
mutex plus similar mutex
11 matches
Mail list logo
