On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, Nathan Neulinger wrote:
> Here's a trace with sddr55. I'm not seeing the same errors as when
> debugging was not enabled, but still taking forever, and quite a few
> multi-second hangs in the diagnostics.
I see these multi-second delays in both your logs. But so far as I can
On Thu, 2003-12-25 at 22:04, Nathan Neulinger wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-12-25 at 21:45, Nathan Neulinger wrote:
> > It looks like sddr09 definately behaves better than sddr55, but still
> > unusable. Below is trace... I will try to get a sddr55 one shortly.
> >
> > -- Nathan
>
> Here's a trace with s
On Thu, 2003-12-25 at 21:05, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, Nathan Neulinger wrote:
>
> > On additional detail, it appears to be specific to this motherboard, as
> > I'm able to use the devices just fine with a laptop running a mandrake
> > 2.4.22 kernel build.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
On Thu, 25 Dec 2003, Nathan Neulinger wrote:
> On additional detail, it appears to be specific to this motherboard, as
> I'm able to use the devices just fine with a laptop running a mandrake
> 2.4.22 kernel build.
>
> Any suggestions?
When working on a problem like this, it helps to configure y
On additional detail, it appears to be specific to this motherboard, as
I'm able to use the devices just fine with a laptop running a mandrake
2.4.22 kernel build.
Any suggestions?
I have both an sddr09 and sddr55, and both yielded the same symptom.
(Bought the sddr55 back when there wasn't any
I did a little repetitive compilation and narrowed down where it
broke.
2.4.21-pre5 - works fine
2.4.21-pre6 - hard lock w/ usb-storage
2.4.21-pre7 - same timeout symptoms as with everything else newer.
I saw a few changelog entries that seemed vaguely relevant, but have
not tracked down any furt
