[linux-usb-devel] Re: Dane-Elec PhotoMate Combo

2001-04-29 Thread Andries . Brouwer
From: Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > (ii) this card needs usb/storage/dpcm.c which is compiled when > CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DPCM is set, but this variable is missing > from usb/Config.in. Add it. This config option is considered so immature that it's not ready for the k

[linux-usb-devel] Queued / linked bulk urb's to different endpoints

2001-04-29 Thread Sancho Dauskardt
Once again the turn-time issue, which is really serious for the usb-storage device i'm fighting with, since it can only do max 4k transfers (again this EZ-USB thing that doesn't enumerate and therfore doesn't change the interfaces). Trying to optimize following sequence: - send command to bulk

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Queued / linked bulk urb's to different endpoints

2001-04-29 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 06:27:53PM +0200, Sancho Dauskardt wrote: > Once again the turn-time issue, which is really serious for the usb-storage > device i'm fighting with, since it can only do max 4k transfers (again this > EZ-USB thing that doesn't enumerate and therfore doesn't change the > i

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Queued / linked bulk urb's to different endpoints

2001-04-29 Thread Sancho Dauskardt
> > Trying to optimize following sequence: > > - send command to bulk ep 4. I call this the 'master-urb' > > - recieve data from bulk ep 2. I call this the 'slave-urb' > >Is there a reason you can't submit the read urb to ep 2 before sending >the command to ep 4? Good idea... Well, what can i s

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Queued / linked bulk urb's to different endpoints - SMP OK

2001-04-29 Thread Sancho Dauskardt
>Well, what can i say. mount'ing the 64MB SmartMedia now takes 8.5 sec (vs >16.6) ! >But a 'cat /mnt/sm/* >/dev/null' still freezes the machine after 10-20 sec. >I've tried it with both uhci + usb-uhci (2.4.4). Basically this is the >same behavior as what i described under "a)" - except that th

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Non-input HID - take 2

2001-04-29 Thread Brad Hards
Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > The patch is now added to the input CVS. I've done a deeper cut when > integrating it - I've split the original hid into the hid core and > hid-input bindings. Check the cvs (linuxconsole.sourceforge.net) for any > mistakes I did in the integration. It'll need some more wo

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Queued / linked bulk urb's to different endpoints

2001-04-29 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:44:51PM +0200, Sancho Dauskardt wrote: > > > > > Trying to optimize following sequence: > > > - send command to bulk ep 4. I call this the 'master-urb' > > > - recieve data from bulk ep 2. I call this the 'slave-urb' > > > >Is there a reason you can't submit the read u

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Non-input HID - take 2

2001-04-29 Thread Greg KH
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 08:42:59PM -0700, Adam J. Richter wrote: > I think one reason why HID events are done through the > default control pipe is that HID is designed to be able to > express such complex input and output arrangements that there > could easily be more inputs or output than

RE: [linux-usb-devel] Trying to compile usb-pwc without patching

2001-04-29 Thread Nemosoft Unv.
Hello, On 27-Apr-01 Juan Antonio Martinez wrote: > I'm trying to get usb_pwc-7.0 Phillip usb WebCam drivers compiled as a > separate module, without patching the kernel. So I readed the HOWTO, Which HOWTO? > created a Makefile (attached in this mail)... and go. Evidently crashes, > and gives

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [announce] Philips USB webcam source code

2001-04-29 Thread Nemosoft Unv.
Hi, On 26-Apr-01 Mark McClelland wrote: > "Nemosoft Unv." wrote: > >> No problem... But Im still deciding whats the best strategy. Ive tried >> two approaches: >> >> * distribute a .o file with the code which requires a small patch to the >> Makefile, so that it gets linked in (the current met

RE: [linux-usb-devel] uhci.c updates in 2.4.4-pre7

2001-04-29 Thread Nemosoft Unv.
Greetings, On 26-Apr-01 Johannes Erdfelt wrote: > I managed to get almost all of my uhci.c updates into 2.4.4-pre7. > > This includes the bulk queuing fixes, the pci consistent support, the > completion list to fix the deadlocks and various other bug fixes. > > If you've had any problems with u

[linux-usb-devel] Re: Dane-Elec PhotoMate Combo

2001-04-29 Thread Matthew Dharm
I would seriously argue with the "works beautifully" part of that. The DPCM code relies on the SDDR09 code, which is horrendously buggy. It's also being actively worked on. I can crash it at will with relatively simple operations. Matt On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 02:21:11PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Non-input HID - take 2

2001-04-29 Thread Paul Stewart
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > >> The patch is now added to the input CVS. I've done a deeper cut when >> integrating it - I've split the original hid into the hid core and >> hid-input bindings. Check the cvs (linuxconsole.sourceforge.net) for any >> mistakes I

RE: [linux-usb-devel] Trying to compile usb-pwc without patching

2001-04-29 Thread Juan Antonio Martinez
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Nemosoft Unv. wrote: > > Well, in the past I have received similar ´packages´ to compile the module > outside the kernel. And they all suffered from the same problem: the > presented Makefiles were specific for their system. The options passed to > gcc vary from system to sys