On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:24:07PM +1200, Bill Ryder wrote:
HI Greg,
Couple of questions.
Do you have a timeframe for 2.4.22?
I have no idea, as I'm not the one releasing it :)
Can you recommend a 2.5 kernel which will probably work on my laptop?
The latest one? I'm using it right
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Greg KH wrote:
Hi,
Here are some small USB changes. Basically all little cleanups and
bugfixes, nothing major.
Please pull from: bk://linuxusb.bkbits.net/linus-2.5
Another bk-only patch. Guess I'd better look at the free (as in license,
not cost) clone again.
--
Hi,
driver core protects us with semaphores during probe/disconnect. We can
stop messing with the module usage counts.
Regards
Oliver
You can import this changeset into BK by piping this whole message to:
'| bk receive [path to repository]' or apply the patch as usual.
This patch:
- Makes usbnet pay attention to device descriptors in
the most common cases; there's less need to embed device
specific details. This lets it work with high speed
devices, and should help interop with the newer ARM/PXA
kernels usb-eth (same vid/pid, different endpoints).
Hi,
this won't be quite to Greg's liking as it introduces holding another
semaphore, but it is needed. You must not probe and reset at the same time.
This can best be assured by the device's semaphore.
Regards
Oliver
You can import this changeset into BK by piping this
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:02:43PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Hi,
this won't be quite to Greg's liking as it introduces holding another
semaphore, but it is needed. You must not probe and reset at the same time.
This can best be assured by the device's semaphore.
Why not just use the usb
Duncan Sands wrote:
Don't hang the system if an urb is submitted on a non-existant endpoint.
Should probably be checked higher up, but this is where I hit it.
In fact it'd be good if you can find out why exactly the
version of this test the usb_submit_urb() code (core/urb.c)
wasn't catching this
Am Donnerstag, 27. März 2003 01:54 schrieb Greg KH:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 11:02:43PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Hi,
this won't be quite to Greg's liking as it introduces holding another
semaphore, but it is needed. You must not probe and reset at the same
time. This can best be
speedtch.c | 26 ++
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/misc/speedtch.c b/drivers/usb/misc/speedtch.c
--- a/drivers/usb/misc/speedtch.c Wed Mar 26 18:02:57 2003
+++ b/drivers/usb/misc/speedtch.c Wed Mar 26 18:02:57 2003
Brad Hards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doing it in kernel space with module options is gross. This is clearly a
case for userspace.
See:
http://www.linmagau.org/modules.php?name=Sectionsop=viewarticleartid=40
And for those who actually want the code:
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 18:17, Bill Davidsen wrote:
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Greg KH wrote:
Hi,
Here are some small USB changes. Basically all little cleanups and
bugfixes, nothing major.
Please pull from: bk://linuxusb.bkbits.net/linus-2.5
Another bk-only patch. Guess I'd better
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Another bk-only patch. Guess I'd better look at the free (as in license,
not cost) clone again.
Well, since BK has made it so trivial for me to merge with Greg, the thing
is already integrated into my tree, and as a result the patches should
On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 18:34, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Stay in the stone age if you wish, but don't expect your stone-age
muscle-propellered log car to go as fast as the rocket of the future. And
Rocket propelled cars cause lots of flames unfortunately 8)
13 matches
Mail list logo
