[linux-usb-devel] 优惠代开发票!

2006-02-28 Thread 李建国
尊敬的公司领负责人(经理/财务)您们好! 我是深圳市亿嘉实业有限公司的,我司实力雄厚,有着艮好的社 会关系。由于我司进项较多,完成不了每月销售额度,公司决定采取 最优惠的方式来对外代开发票。代开范围:增值税、海关缴款书、普 通商品销售发票;地税,建筑安装、运输、广告、服务业、咨询和定 额发票等;本司真诚地希望能够与贵司合作!也可为贵司节约一部分 资金! 如果贵司在发票方面有任何疑虑,可上网查询或我司人员与贵司 人员去税务确定。一切发票可经贵司确认后才付款! 欢迎来电咨询:

[linux-usb-devel] Questions about OCHI Device Detection on PXA271 / linux 2.4.17

2006-02-28 Thread Thomas Seiler
Hello, I am trying to hack together USB Host support for Motorola EZX series of linux based smartphones (like E680i, A780, A1200) and I am stuck with device enumeration. (details see http://www.seili.net/a780usb.php). These phones run a Montavista Linux 2.4.17 with usbfs disabled on Intel PXA271.

[linux-usb-devel] Art�k e�ler, sevgililer, ortaklar birbirini aldatamayacak!

2006-02-28 Thread Sanal Dedektiflik Hizmetleri
SANAL DEDEKTİFLİK HİZMETLERİ Artık eşler, sevgililer, arkadaşlar, ortaklar, birbirini aldatamayacak! TÜRKİYE BU HİZMET VE TEKNİĞİ KONUŞUYOR... YENİ TEKNOLOJİ HİZMETİNİZDE! Sizi aldatan kişinin telefonlarını denetleyebilirsiniz: * (g-01) GEÇMİŞE DÖNÜK SESLİ CEP TELEFON KAYITLARI * (g-02)

[linux-usb-devel] RE: Analyse the USB Control tranfer limits Table please..

2006-02-28 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Mukund JB. wrote: Dear Alan, I am not speaking about the 'Max Transfers' instead I am talking about the MAX bottom most row. I did not understand how is max bandwidth jumped to 187500 value. I understand it suggests that it supports (187500*8) = 1.5Mb/s data rate.

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] UHCI: Increase port-reset completion delay for HP controllers

2006-02-28 Thread Alan Stern
Greg: This patch (as657) increases the port-reset completion delay in uhci-hcd for HP's embedded controllers. Unlike other UHCI controllers, the HP chips can take as long as 250 us to carry out the processing associated with finishing a port reset. This fixes Novell bug #148761. Alan Stern

[linux-usb-devel] RE: Analyze the USB Control transfer limits Table please..

2006-02-28 Thread Mukund JB.
Dear Alan, On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Mukund JB. wrote: Dear Alan, I am not speaking about the 'Max Transfers' instead I am talking about the MAX bottom most row. I did not understand how is max bandwidth jumped to 187500 value. I understand it suggests that it supports (187500*8) = 1.5Mb/s

Re: [linux-usb-devel] RE: Analyze the USB Control transfer limits Table please..

2006-02-28 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Mukund JB. wrote: Dear Alan, On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Mukund JB. wrote: Dear Alan, I am not speaking about the 'Max Transfers' instead I am talking about the MAX bottom most row. I did not understand how is max bandwidth jumped to 187500 value. I understand

[linux-usb-devel] Bulk Transfer fails in USB 2.0

2006-02-28 Thread Jayaprakash Shanmugam
Hi All, I face a different scenario where the software on the host works if the device is in USB 1.1. If the device is configured as USB 2.0, the bulk_read from the device returns EOVERFLOW error. I am running 2.6.11 and the host has 2 EHCI cores and 1 OHCI core. ( Philips ISP 1561 ). The

[linux-usb-devel] usb usb5: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.16-rc5-mm1 ehci_hcd

2006-02-28 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
Lines like the one below puzzle me for a couple -mm's: usb usb5: new device found, idVendor=, idProduct= usb usb5: new device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=1 usb usb5: Product: EHCI Host Controller == usb usb5: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.16-rc5-mm1 ehci_hcd == usb usb5:

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb usb5: Manufacturer: Linux 2.6.16-rc5-mm1 ehci_hcd

2006-02-28 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: Lines like the one below puzzle me for a couple -mm's: usb usb5: new device found, idVendor=, idProduct= usb usb5: new device strings: Mfr=3, Product=2, SerialNumber=1 usb usb5: Product: EHCI Host Controller == usb usb5: Manufacturer:

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Bulk Transfer fails in USB 2.0

2006-02-28 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Jayaprakash Shanmugam wrote: Hi All, I face a different scenario where the software on the host works if the device is in USB 1.1. If the device is configured as USB 2.0, the bulk_read from the device returns EOVERFLOW error. I am running 2.6.11 and the host has 2

[linux-usb-devel] [GIT PATCH] USB fixes for 2.6.16-rc5

2006-02-28 Thread Greg KH
Here are some USB fixes for 2.6.16-rc5. They fix a EHCI handoff issue, a few gadget issues, and add some more device ids for various drivers. All of these patches have been in the -mm tree for a while, except for one of the add a new device id ones. Please pull from:

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 2/7] USB: Wisegroup MP-8866 Dual USB Joypad

2006-02-28 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
This patch is for the Dual USB Joypad [0925:8866] from Wisegroup. The HID_QUIRK_NOGET is necessary for it to respond to input, and the HID_QUIRK_MULTI_INPUT is necessary to have two js# nodes appear. Signed-off-by: Andrew Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Dmitry Torokhov [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 3/7] USB: unusual_devs entry for Lyra RCA RD1080

2006-02-28 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
This patch (as656) adds an unusual_devs.h entry for the Lyra RCA RD1080 MP3 player. Its card-reader firmware has the common report-one-too-many-sectors bug. This fixes Novell bug #152175. Signed-off-by: Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 5/7] USB: Gadget RNDIS fix alloc bug. (buffer overflow)

2006-02-28 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
Remote NDIS response to OID_GEN_SUPPORTED_LIST only allocated space for the data attached to the reply, and not the reply structure itself. This caused other kmalloc'd memory to be corrupted. Signed-off-by: Shaun Tancheff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB-Gadget: support for fhg_usb32

2006-02-28 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 09:42:02PM +0100, Thomas Brinker wrote: + if (ep-dev-stall_state (0x1 ep-number)) { + FHG_USB32_IEP_STALL |= 0x1 ep-number; + FHG_USB32_OEP_STALL |= 0x1 ep-number; + } else { Your email client ate all of the tabs for lunch and spit them out as spaces :( Care to

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 4/7] USB: lh7a40x gadget driver: Fixed a dead lock

2006-02-28 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
There is a dead lock in lh7a40x udc driver. When the driver receive a SET_FEATURE HALT request, the dev lock is taken by the interrupt handler lh7a40x_udc_irq then the handler will call lh7a40x_set_halt function which in its turn will try to acquire the dev lock. Signed-off-by: Franck Bui-Huu

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 1/7] USB: fix EHCI BIOS handshake

2006-02-28 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
Fix http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6128 Finish morphing the early handoff version of the EHCI BIOS handshake over to match the previous implementation inside the EHCI driver (except that now we forcibly disable the SMI). The version that had been with the PCI code was surprisingly

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 7/7] USB: ftdi_sio: new microHAM device IDs

2006-02-28 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
This patch adds a bunch of new device IDs to the ftdi_sio driver for various devices from microHAM using FTDI chips. Micheal Studer supplied the PID for the USB-Y9 device. I examined the INF file in microHAM's Windows driver package for the USB-KW, USB-YS, USB-IC, USB-DB9 and USB-RS232 devices.

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Question about OTG operations

2006-02-28 Thread Stephen J. Gowdy
FYI the original didn't make it to the list due to an HTML attachment. On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, David Brownell wrote: On Tuesday 28 February 2006 4:15 am, Li Yang-r58472 wrote: I'm doing OTG support on a Freescale PowerPC platform. The basic ID specified role change can work correctly. Good

[linux-usb-devel] Re: usb otg support for omap platform

2006-02-28 Thread David Brownell
On Monday 13 February 2006 1:30 am, jinzhucheng wrote: David: I find usb otg code in linux-2.6.12/omap-udc.c, Can you tell me if you test otg function for omap platform using omap-udc? Hm, this landed in my SPAM box, sorry for the delayed response... It was last tested on 2.6.10 at some

[linux-usb-devel] RE: Question about OTG operations

2006-02-28 Thread Li Yang-r58472
Thanks Dave, So the current application of HNP is only to correct wrongly connected cable? I don't think it's the original target of adding OTG to USB. Though we don't have much examples of OTG usage in the market, I do think OTG is to add the peer-to-peer ability to the previous

[linux-usb-devel] Re: Question about OTG operations

2006-02-28 Thread David Brownell
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 7:44 pm, Li Yang-r58472 wrote: Thanks Dave, So the current application of HNP is only to correct wrongly connected cable? That's not what I said, but it _is_ the only scenario that's completely spelled out in the specs. Once HNP is enabled, if the host side

[linux-usb-devel] FYI -- AVR gets USB OTG

2006-02-28 Thread David Brownell
There seems to be a lot of interest in USB OTG lately, and I thought I'd pass on something I saw recently that looked interesting: http://www.atmel.com/dyn/corporate/view_detail.asp?FileName=AT90USB1287_2_14.html That's a press release (with links to chip specs). Notice that $40 USB-OTG

[linux-usb-devel] Reviving lh7a40x_udc driver

2006-02-28 Thread Marc Singer
Thought I'd turn on the lh7a40x driver for grins and see what happens. Turns out that it didn't even compile. Once that was fixed, it still wouldn't connect using the serial gadget driver. The first error I see, on connecting the USB cable, is - ERROR: gadget setup FAILED (stalling), setup

RE: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Question about OTG operations

2006-02-28 Thread Steve Calfee
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 7:44 pm, Li Yang-r58472 wrote: Thanks Dave, So the current application of HNP is only to correct wrongly connected cable? That's not what I said, but it _is_ the only scenario that's completely spelled out in the specs. One other really useful aspect of OTG is

[linux-usb-devel] RE: Question about OTG operations

2006-02-28 Thread Li Yang-r58472
-Original Message- From: David Brownell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:59 PM To: Li Yang-r58472 Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: Question about OTG operations On Tuesday 28 February 2006 7:44 pm, Li Yang-r58472 wrote: Thanks

RE: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Question about OTG operations

2006-02-28 Thread Li Yang-r58472
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Calfee Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 2:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Question about OTG operations On Tuesday 28

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Question about OTG operations

2006-02-28 Thread David Brownell
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 10:20 pm, Steve Calfee wrote: So for instance if you have a battery powered PC and wish to connect it to a powered printer or a display device it would be nice if the A connector goes into the peripheral and the b into the computer that way the computer would

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Reviving lh7a40x_udc driver

2006-02-28 Thread Marc Singer
On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:29:03PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: On Tuesday 28 February 2006 9:48 pm, Marc Singer wrote: The question is this: what is the simplest gadget to use for debugging a UDC driver? I started with the serial gadget because I figured it would be easy to verify that

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Reviving lh7a40x_udc driver

2006-02-28 Thread David Brownell
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 9:48 pm, Marc Singer wrote: The question is this: what is the simplest gadget to use for debugging a UDC driver? I started with the serial gadget because I figured it would be easy to verify that it is working. Gadget Zero is designed to be the place to start; see

RE: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Question about OTG operations

2006-02-28 Thread Steve Calfee
From: Li Yang-r58472 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Steve Calfee [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Question about OTG operations Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:44:31 +0800 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Question about OTG operations

2006-02-28 Thread Steve Calfee
From: David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Steve Calfee [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Question about OTG operations Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 22:46:42 -0800 On Tuesday 28 February 2006 10:20 pm, Steve Calfee wrote: So for instance

RE: [linux-usb-devel] RE: Analyze the USB Control transfer limits Table please..

2006-02-28 Thread Mukund JB.
Dear Alan, Thanks for the response. I am not speaking about the 'Max Transfers' instead I am talking about the MAX bottom most row. I did not understand how is max bandwidth jumped to 187500 value. I understand it suggests that it supports (187500*8) = 1.5Mb/s data rate. Looks

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: Question about OTG operations

2006-02-28 Thread David Brownell
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 11:03 pm, Steve Calfee wrote: Yes, it is a huge drawback to the spec. Being host does not say you provide power, being A connector does. How do you communicate the fact that your handheld can use and get power from a device if it is plugged in properly. That