gt; should be close to working. Anyway, the driverfs infrastructure itself
> is in place in 2.5, so even if the PCI part wasn't there, still we can
> convert USB and Input to it.
>From pre4 changelog:
- Patrick Mochel: devicefs updates, add PCI devices into the hierarchy
--
| Da
1), but that's pretty boring :)
"usb_root0" .. "usb_rootN" ?
btw, a script to marry the busid's from driverfs to lspci/lsusb
output may be useful in the future especially if combined somehow
with tree(1). Could be very handy when it gets time to debug
those "M
.
> And which host controller driver are you using?
CONFIG_USB_UHCI_ALT=y
--
| Dave Jones.http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 09:31:24PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Dave, does this problem go away on 2.5.3-pre6?
Great, heisenbug. Subsequent reboots under any kernel
haven't managed to reproduce the problem.
--
| Dave Jones.http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| S
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 09:19:30PM +0200, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> +/* Standard include files */
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
config.h is automatically included by kbuild for some time now,
so you don't need to explicitly include it.
> +#defi
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 05:14:40PM -0700, Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Subject: laptops with e1000: lockups
> > References :
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229603
> > Submitter : Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 06:39:24PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> Various unusual dev entries accumulated from Ubuntu bug reports.
>
> CC: Phil Dibowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Signed-off-by: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROT
Hi folks,
Given the potential power savings USB_SUSPEND offers, we'd
like to turn this on in Fedora kernels, however there still
seems to be quite a few devices out there that seem to have issues.
(Notably printers it seems). For our development kernels, we're
just shipping stuff as-is, so that
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 08:07:01PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Sunday 15 July 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > Before I dig deeper, are there other side-effects of changing
> > this default ?
>
> Other than spending more power than necessary? :)
>
>
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 10:38:48AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > -static int usb_autosuspend_delay = 2; /* Default delay value,
> > +static int usb_autosuspend_delay = 0; /* Default delay value,
> > * in seconds */
> > module_
On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 03:22:17PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > I'm not sure how that 5-1.4 relates to the above map.
> >
> > oh, there's one other case, where it prints the same thing for usb 4-2:
>
> All right, it turns out there really is a minor bug that shows up only
> with the autos
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 04:43:16PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > Windows will autosuspend hubs, bluetooth devices, HID devices
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> are you sure about windows suspending the HID devices in runtime? I have
> never seen LEDs of
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:06:08PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> Sometimes when I plug in a USB device I get a dialog asking if I want to
> configure it ... surely it would be possible to have that mechanism also
> consult a database (part of a distro, or on some web server) fpr info
> about
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 09:57:45AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Kernel developers are a diverser lot than you think ;-)
> We don't enable autosuspend in drivers we can't test, except where
> the lack of a kernel driver forces us to use a broad swipe. Printers
> were tested, too, and most pri
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 04:32:07PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Freitag 03 August 2007 schrieb Dave Jones:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 09:57:45AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> >
> > > Kernel developers are a diverser lot than you think ;-)
> > > We do
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 12:34:47PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 10:24:16 -0400, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 09:57:45AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> >
> > > Kernel developers are a diverser lot than
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 06:08:11PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Freitag 03 August 2007 schrieb Matthew Garrett:
> > > Which is why I didn't suggest doing that, of course. The only
> > > one making that kind of straw man argument seems to be you.
> >
> > But however you phrase it, that's
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 10:44:35AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 01:32:53PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 02:26:43PM +0200, Rogan Dawes wrote:
> >
> > > Compare that to:
> > >
> > > "My USB printer broke, guess I'd better report it to LKML".
>
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 05:17:24PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > here's a head start for you.
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243038
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzill
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 05:31:52PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > Plus if you're connected to such a device for monitoring purposes you're
> > probably powered by it as well, so you have little to gain from suspend
> > even if it works.
>
> I currently don't have any HID UPS by hand to veri
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 02:58:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Alexander Nyberg wrote:
> >
> > > Not sure what you mean by "make kexec work nicer" but if it is because
> > > some devices don't work after a kexec I have some
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 11:39:39AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Well, you can do "half suspend to ram; change your frequency; half
> resume" today, and it should work, but I do not think you'll like the
> speed.
Indeed. With people running things like cpuspeed daemons to dynamically
scale spe
I was curious why my firewall was loading a 'phone driver'.
It turns out that the probing in the yealink driver is
a little too assuming..
static struct usb_device_id usb_table [] = {
{ USB_INTERFACE_INFO(USB_CLASS_HID, 0, 0) },
{ }
};
So it picked up my UPS, and loaded the driver.
Whilst
A nasty 2.6.15 report from one of our Fedora users.
Dave
> then when it got to map my USB drive:
> SCSI device sdb: 321672960 512-byte hdwr sectors (164697 MB)
> slab error in cache_free_debugcheck(): cache `sgpool-8': double free, or
> memory outside object was overwritten
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:28:38PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Michal Jaegermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:57:48AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 00:12 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think we can assume that it
25 matches
Mail list logo
