Re: [linux-usb-devel] Writing drivers for USB web camera??

2006-06-05 Thread Jaya Kumar
On 6/1/06, pratapg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am Pratap.G from PUNE IIIT and I am currently working on the web camera based digital image acquisition system. I havent choosen vendor for web camera and I need multiple cameras to have the multiple views of the image in visual

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [Fwd: [PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 1/1] usbvideo misc cleanup]

2006-05-23 Thread Jaya Kumar
On 5/17/06, Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm... It seems that those drivers are without any current maintainer. At least, from my research, I didn't noticed any patch from a maintainer at 2.6 git tree. Anyway, let's copy both Dmitri and Simon. I dunno who were the authors for

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 2.6.17-rc4 1/1] usbvideo misc cleanup

2006-05-17 Thread Jaya Kumar
threads: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=114770240416519w=2 [ unneccessary urb initialization of .status ] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernelm=114767440903341w=2 [ shouldn't build the cbTbl structs on the stack ] I hope it's okay with the respective authors. Thanks, Jaya Kumar

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH/RFC 2.6.17-rc4 1/1] usbvideo/quickcam_messenger driver v4

2006-05-17 Thread Jaya Kumar
for the Logitech Quickcam Messenger USB webcam. This patch has been rebased against 2.6.17-rc4 as per Greg's feedback. Please let me know if it looks okay and if you have any feedback or suggestions. Thanks, Jaya Kumar Signed-off-by: Jaya Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Kconfig | 12

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH/RFC 2.6.17-rc4 1/1] usbvideo/quickcam_messenger driver v4

2006-05-17 Thread Jaya Kumar
On 5/18/06, Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jaya, This patch I've already applied at the tree (based on the e-mail you've sent to lkml). Thanks Mauro. Yup, it's the same patch. Sorry about the . I got sloppy with the CC lists. jaya

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH/RFC 2.6.16.5 1/1] usb/media/quickcam_messenger driver v2

2006-05-16 Thread Jaya Kumar
On 5/15/06, Oliver Neukum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Montag, 15. Mai 2006 10:49 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +urb-status = 0; +urb-actual_length = 0; These are not needed. Indeed you should never write to those fields. Regards Oliver I see. Good point. I ought to

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH/RFC 2.6.16.5 1/1] usb/media/quickcam_messenger driver v2

2006-05-16 Thread Jaya Kumar
On 5/15/06, Jaya Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: drivers/usb/media % egrep urb-status.*= *.c snip konicawc.c:urb-status = 0; se401.c:urb-status=0; stv680.c: urb-status = 0; usbvideo.c: urb-status = 0; w9968cf.c: urb-status = 0; I guess since usb_submit_urb also

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH/RFC 2.6.16.5 1/1] usb/media/quickcam_messenger driver

2006-05-16 Thread Jaya Kumar
On 5/15/06, Oliver Neukum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Building this data structure on the stack is a shooting offense. I completely agree with you (except for the shooting part :-). I'll make the corrections. In my defense, I copied that from the konicawc code. drivers/usb/media/konicawc.c 921

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Where to start with making a device driver

2006-05-16 Thread Jaya Kumar
On 5/17/06, Arthur Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay. I saw that book on Amazon, but noted that it said that it was for 2.4x kernels. I am not a fan of doing that much reading on the LDD3 covers 2.6 , http://lwn.net/Kernel/LDD3/ computer (as much as I like computers). So I think I will

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH/RFC 2.6.16.5 1/1] usb/media/quickcam_messenger driver

2006-05-14 Thread Jaya Kumar
On 5/15/06, Oliver Neukum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Sonntag, 14. Mai 2006 16:11 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: +static int qcm_setup_on_open(struct uvd *uvd) +{ +qcm_sensor_set_gains(uvd, uvd-vpic.hue, +uvd-vpic.colour, uvd-vpic.contrast); +qcm_sensor_set_exposure(uvd, uvd-vpic.brightness);