transaction going? I suspect it
is not the FX2 chip, but I haven't verified that yet.
It would still be nice to have high-bandwidth interrupt
packets (24Mb/sec guaranteed bandwidth) eventually. But for now
I'm happy with 12Mb/sec bulk transactions.
Alan and David, thanks for your help.
Richard
--
Richard
Prot=ff Driver=fiber
E: Ad=01(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
E: Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms
E: Ad=82(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS=1022 Ivl=125us
--
Richard Stover email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Detector Development Laboratory http://www.ccd.ucolick.org
UCO/Lick
in the callback.
When I use 3066 instead of the bogus 5118 the transfers
appear to happen, but now I get one call to my callback
every 3 milliseconds instead of every millisecond. So
it is still doing only one 1022 byte transfer per millisecond.
Richard
--
Richard Stover email: [EMAIL
.
It isn't clear that this is possible.
The FX2 has four large endpoints. I'm going to try running
all four in parallel to see if I can push the throughput up.
I can reassemble the data packets from the four endpoints later.
Thanks for your suggestions.
Richard
--
Richard Stover
all four of
its large endpoints in parallel. It seems this won't work
to improve throughput, if I understand correctly what you're
saying. But perhaps it would work for bulk transfers?
Thanks for your assistance.
Richard
--
Richard Stover email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Detector
