Re: [linux-usb-devel] Update: USB gadget API [1 of 3]

2003-02-21 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:21:16AM -0800, David Brownell wrote: In late November I posted a draft of a gadget API, which would drive the device-side USB controller hardware as more of those systems grew smart enough to use Linux inside. This is starting to look good, thanks a lot for doing

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Update: USB gadget API [1 of 3]

2003-02-21 Thread David Brownell
Hi, I'd like to start playing with this, can you send out some patches that I can add to my local tree? Or I guess I can pull them from your bk tree, if you don't mind. I'll circulate patches a bit later, after I merge some updates to make that loopback configuration actually do work. That

[linux-usb-devel] Update: USB gadget API [1 of 3]

2003-02-07 Thread David Brownell
In late November I posted a draft of a gadget API, which would drive the device-side USB controller hardware as more of those systems grew smart enough to use Linux inside. I got some good feedback then, and now seems a good time to provide an update. It'll be in two followup posts: *

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Update: USB gadget API [1 of 3]

2003-02-07 Thread Oliver Neukum
* updated linux/usb_gadget.h ... per-frame irqs gone, status and feature flags allow hardware handling (as required by cpus like pxa250), usb suspend/resume aren't exposed, and usb_request did need to have some flag bits declared. How does the gadget driver learn of

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Update: USB gadget API [1 of 3]

2003-02-07 Thread David Brownell
Oliver Neukum wrote: * updated linux/usb_gadget.h ... per-frame irqs gone, status and feature flags allow hardware handling (as required by cpus like pxa250), usb suspend/resume aren't exposed, and usb_request did need to have some flag bits declared. How does the gadget