Greg:
My update for usb-skeleton seems to have gotten lost in the shuffle, so
here it is again -- all wrapped up in one nice little patch. It's been
tested by three different people and passed with flying colors. Please
apply.
Alan Stern
= usb-skeleton.c 1.37 vs edited =
---
Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, David Brownell wrote:
Alan Stern wrote:
I think it's probably okay to apply this patch. More testing would be
good, but I don't have any suitable hardware. And I think a
software-loopback sort of test wouldn't address many of my changes very
well.
Ah, but
Alan Stern wrote:
Here is a slightly updated patch for usb-skeleton.c. It has been tested
minimally with real hardware, but David Brownell would like to see some
more tests using gadget zero.
I just did, to a 2.5.62ish system running gadget zero on real hardware.
It seemed to behave, though there
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, David Brownell wrote:
Alan Stern wrote:
Here is a slightly updated patch for usb-skeleton.c. It has been tested
minimally with real hardware, but David Brownell would like to see some
more tests using gadget zero.
I just did, to a 2.5.62ish system running gadget
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 02:14:54PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
I think it's probably okay to apply this patch. More testing would be
good, but I don't have any suitable hardware. And I think a
software-loopback sort of test wouldn't address many of my changes very
well.
Just a quick test:
Alan Stern wrote:
I think it's probably okay to apply this patch. More testing would be
good, but I don't have any suitable hardware. And I think a
software-loopback sort of test wouldn't address many of my changes very
well.
Ah, but gadget zero plus the software loopback HCD will emulate most
Here is a slightly updated patch for usb-skeleton.c. It has been tested
minimally with real hardware, but David Brownell would like to see some
more tests using gadget zero.
There are a couple of small changes that were not included in previous
patches I sent in. The driver now just looks for
