[Linux-usb-users] Re: [BAWUG] ATMEL AT76C503A USB 802.11b adapters under Linux

2002-02-21 Thread Jerry Normandin
What's all this? There's no need! I've got open source drivers for the 802.11b devices. I own the USB 802.11b interface by Linksys, Also the PCMCIA based one.I've got the drivers working on 2.4.x and they are open source. Reverse engineering isn't against the law. if the product is on the op

[Linux-usb-users] Re: [BAWUG] ATMEL AT76C503A USB 802.11b adapters under Linux

2002-02-19 Thread Jacek Pliszka
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Actually, no it isn't. Because of the closed driver, we're never going to > get access to the documentation needed to create an open-sourced driver. > Atmel points to the closed source driver and says "why would you need an > open sourced one, ours w

[Linux-usb-users] Re: [BAWUG] ATMEL AT76C503A USB 802.11b adapters under Linux

2002-02-19 Thread bvermeul
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Jacek Pliszka wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > It _IS_ binary only. > > Let's get any working one first. With working driver it will be easier > to write an open-source one. Actually, no it isn't. Because of the closed driver, we're never going to

[Linux-usb-users] Re: [BAWUG] ATMEL AT76C503A USB 802.11b adapters under Linux

2002-02-19 Thread Russell Nelson
Jacek Pliszka writes: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Jim Thompson wrote: > > Jacek Pliszka writes: > > > Let's get any working one first. With working driver it will be easier > > > to write an open-source one. > > > > You mean 'reverse engineer', right? :-) > > Reverse engineering will most li

[Linux-usb-users] Re: [BAWUG] ATMEL AT76C503A USB 802.11b adapters under Linux

2002-02-19 Thread Jacek Pliszka
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Jim Thompson wrote: > Jacek Pliszka writes: > > Let's get any working one first. With working driver it will be easier > > to write an open-source one. > > You mean 'reverse engineer', right? :-) Reverse engineering will most likely be forbidden by the license. It would be

[Linux-usb-users] Re: [BAWUG] ATMEL AT76C503A USB 802.11b adapters under Linux

2002-02-19 Thread Jim Thompson
Jacek Pliszka writes: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > It _IS_ binary only. > > Let's get any working one first. With working driver it will be easier > to write an open-source one. You mean 'reverse engineer', right? :-) ___

[Linux-usb-users] Re: [BAWUG] ATMEL AT76C503A USB 802.11b adapters under Linux

2002-02-19 Thread Jacek Pliszka
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It _IS_ binary only. Let's get any working one first. With working driver it will be easier to write an open-source one. BR, Jacek ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: http

[Linux-usb-users] Re: [BAWUG] ATMEL AT76C503A USB 802.11b adapters under Linux

2002-02-19 Thread bvermeul
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Jim Thompson wrote: > > Be sure to complain loud and long if/when it turns out to be binary-only. It _IS_ binary only. Bas Vermeulen -- "God, root, what is difference?" -- Pitr, User Friendly "God is more forgiving." -- Dave Aronson

[Linux-usb-users] Re: [BAWUG] ATMEL AT76C503A USB 802.11b adapters under Linux

2002-02-18 Thread Jim Thompson
Be sure to complain loud and long if/when it turns out to be binary-only. Jacek Pliszka writes: > Hi! > > I got the following e-mail from Atmel developer: > > > We have completed a USB driver for Linux. It is in BETA test and soon > > will be released. However, as the silicon vendor, we do n