On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:34:51 -0400 (EDT)
Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder whether the code in question was supposed to be running at all.
> Arkadiusz, what sort of USB devices do you have attached to the computer?
He of course has an ADSL USB modem (sice he uses uEagle-ATM driver
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 09:14:19 +0200
Paolo Ornati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So one obvious test that Arkadiusz can make is to try to crash 2.6.18
> without using his modem: just detach the USB cable before boot so the
> driver isn't loaded (and even if it's loaded by a "modprobe" in
> init scripts
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, Paolo Ornati wrote:
> The code dumped from memory matches the original one up to, and not
> including, the failing istruction. From that point the code is
> different.
>
>
> The failure is only a natural consequence of:
>
> add%ah,(%eax)
>
> with "eax" pointing to
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 23:47:06 +0200
Arkadiusz Jalowiec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 000f9edf
> printing epip
> *pde=
> Ops: 0002 [#1]
> Modules linked in: ppp_deflate zlib_deflate bsd_comp pppoatm ipv6
> partport_pc partport sn
Paolo Ornati wrote:
> Another crazy theory (based on my horrible experience with a
> defective memory module):
>
I don't know, but I think this theory is possibly :(
> There is an hard to trigger single bit error not detected by memtest
> near (physical) memory address 6b79f00(ESP) (where the E
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:49:52 -0400 (EDT)
Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The alternative is that something caused a jump directly to the byte at
> 2b. Maybe a return address got corrupted on the stack; obviously there
> aren't any direct jumps to that location. I don't have a clue how
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Paolo Ornati wrote:
> This one should be correct:
>
> :
>0: 5c pop%esp
>1: 89 57 2cmov%edx,0x2c(%edi)
>4: 8b 40 44mov0x44(%eax),%eax
>7: c7 47 40 00 00 00 00movl $0x0,0x40(
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:29:04 -0400 (EDT)
Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But we have:
> >
> > 500894: 74 3f je 5008d5 <_end+0x2d>
> > 500896: 0f b6 46 20 movzbl 0x20(%rsi),%eax
> > 50089a: 8b 4e 20mov0x20(%rsi
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Paolo Ornati wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:33:30 +
> Arkadiusz Jalowiec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > OOps:
> >
> > ivalid opcode: [#1]
> > CPU: 0
> > EIP: 0060: [] Not tainted VLI
> > EFLAGS: 00010003 (2.6.18#1)
> > EIP is at uhci_giveback_urb+0x59/0x126 [uhc
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:33:30 +
Arkadiusz Jalowiec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OOps:
>
> ivalid opcode: [#1]
> Modules linked in ppp_deflate zlib_deflate bsd_comp pppoatm ipv6
> partport_pc partport snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer oss via_agp agpgart
> ueagle_atm usbatm uhci_hcd ehci_hcd usbcore
Paolo Ornati wrote:
>
>
> Maybe you have hardware problems?
>
> Have you tried to run memtest86 and/or memtest86+ for many hours?
>
> http://www.memtest86.com/
> http://www.memtest.org/
>
>
Tonight I test my memory of my computer. Memory is ok. No errors. I
don't have any problems with my hardw
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:33:30 +
Arkadiusz Jalowiec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have problem with kernels 2.6.x and I don't know what I do. My
> computer always freeze with kernel 2.6.x (I test all kernel stable
> versions with different distributions ). Computer work 2-6 hours and
> crash
12 matches
Mail list logo
