John Carter wrote:
Hokay... there are several things that get into the act of futzy
around with mail.
snip
I'd rather leave my messages on the IMAP server, and keep things as simple as
possible on my end. It looks as if Alpine can do the ultra simple filtering
that I need, so I'd rather
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009, Aidan Gauland wrote:
My sticking point is... setting it up. In mail readers I have used up until
now, there are separate fields in the configuration dialogs for each
parameter for the mail servers. In Alpine, it's all one field for both the
inbox and the SMTP server,
My sticking point is... setting it up. In mail readers I have used up until
now, there are separate fields in the configuration dialogs for each parameter
for the mail servers. In Alpine, it's all one field for both the inbox and
the SMTP server, and I don't know how it's supposed to be
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Aidan Gauland wrote:
Hello,
A while ago--a long while ago, I think--someone on this list shared his
excitement over discovering Alpine, because he was a fan of Pine. I
have since tried a few times to set up Alpine--because it sounded
better than anything else I have
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009, Aidan Gauland wrote:
A while ago--a long while ago, I think--someone on this list shared his
excitement over discovering Alpine, because he was a fan of Pine.
Sounds like me.
but I have failed to overcome the geekiness of it every time.
I set up my
Hi,
I have written on the wonders of alpine before.
It still beats all of the graphical tools I have tried. It is better than
many of my colleague's email systems.
So yes, I am happy to answer questions.
I would note that google is your friend - alpine examples abound on the
web.
In my
